Boomerang Modification of the Septal Extension Graft: Graft Design and Functional Outcomes

R. Daniel Peters,Milind Vasudev,Amir A. Hakimi,Katelyn K. Dilley,Theodore V. Nguyen,Allison Hu,Brian J.F. Wong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2023.0152
2024-01-12
Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine
Abstract:<b>Background:</b> A "boomerang" graft is an end-to-end caudal septal extension graft (SEG) that conforms to the geometry of the anterior septal angle, and avoids septal overlap, unlike a side-to-side SEG. <b>Objective:</b> To compare breathing improvements in rhinoplasty patients receiving boomerang SEGs and patients receiving side-to-side SEGs. <b>Methods:</b> Retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing rhinoplasty with either end-to-end boomerang SEG or a side-to-side SEG. Functional outcomes were assessed through the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) survey. <b>Results:</b> The boomerang SEG cohort had a mean age of 34 years and were 68% female compared with 38 years and 67% female in the side-to-side SEG cohort (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). The cohorts did not differ in the proportion of the lateral crural tensioning, spreader graft placement, or history of rhinoplasty. The boomerang cohort demonstrated a 67% reduction in NOSE scores compared with a 70% reduction among the side-to-side SEG cohort (<i>p</i> = 0.14). Men undergoing boomerang graft placement reported significantly less postoperative functional improvement than men undergoing placement of a side-to-side SEG (62% vs. 77%, <i>p</i> = 0.01). <b>Conclusion:</b> Use of a boomerang graft is not likely to negatively affect rhinoplasty functional outcomes when compared with a side-to-side SEG.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?