Secondary Contouring for the Butterfly Graft: Improving Form and Preserving Function

Rahul Varman,Jonas Miller,J. Madison Clark
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31804
IF: 2.97
2024-09-30
The Laryngoscope
Abstract:This study evaluates the efficacy of the butterfly graft secondary contouring procedure in addressing external nasal contour irregularities following primary butterfly graft placement in rhinoplasty patients. The findings indicate that secondary contouring significantly improves aesthetic outcomes while maintaining nasal airway function, with a majority of patients reporting satisfaction and durable improvements in nasal breathing. Objective The butterfly graft (BFG) secondary contouring procedure addresses external nasal irregularities following the primary BFG surgery. We explore demographic factors associated with the desire for secondary contouring and assess patient‐reported outcomes following the procedure. Methods A retrospective analysis of 374 patients undergoing BFG between April 2020 and April 2023 identified 10 individuals electing for secondary contouring. Demographics, Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) scores, Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI), and decision regret scale (DRS) were collected and reported. Results Secondary contouring rate was 2.7% of total cases. The majority of patients desiring BFG secondary contouring were white females (90%). NOSE scores significantly improved post‐primary surgery (mean change: 51.7, SD: 14.01, p‐value: <0.05). Although overall NOSE scores remained improved after secondary contouring (mean change: 47.2, SD: 18.84, p‐value: <0.05) compared with their preoperative NOSE scores, one patient (10%) reported worse score after secondary contouring. Four patients (40%) reported worsening after secondary contouring compared with after initial BFG surgery. DRS indicated minimal regret from patients. Conclusion BFG secondary contouring is a valuable option for patients with external nasal complaints, providing improvements in nasal appearance and durable improvement in breathing outcomes. We emphasize the importance of patient counseling and appropriate patient selection. Our results suggest that patients should expect a slight worsening of NOSE scores following secondary contouring, but that significant worsening is a low risk. Level of Evidence Level 4: Case series Laryngoscope, 2024
medicine, research & experimental,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?