Abstract:Background & aims: Serrated lesions are an important contributor to colorectal cancer (CRC), notably in the proximal colon. Findings in the distal colorectum are markers of advanced proximal adenomatous neoplasia. However, it is not known whether they affect the odds of advanced proximal serrated lesions. Methods: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of data from 1910 patients (59.3 ± 8.0 years, 53.8% female) who underwent an average-risk screening colonoscopy from August 2005 through April 2012 at Indiana University Hospital and an associated ambulatory surgery center. Colonoscopies were performed by an endoscopist with high rates of detection of adenomas and serrated polyps. Tissue samples of all serrated polyps (hyperplastic, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp [SSA/P], or traditional serrated adenoma) proximal to the sigmoid colon and serrated polyps >5 mm in the rectum or sigmoid colon were reviewed by a gastrointestinal pathologist and reclassified on the basis of World Health Organization criteria. Advanced serrated lesion (ASL) was defined as SSA/P with cytologic dysplasia, SSA/P ≥10 mm, or traditional serrated adenoma. Advanced conventional adenomatous neoplasia (ACN) was defined as tubular adenoma ≥10 mm, villous histology, high-grade dysplasia, or cancer. The prevalence of proximal ASL and ACN was calculated on the basis of distal colorectal findings. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the age-adjusted and sex-adjusted odds of advanced proximal adenomatous and serrated lesions. Secondary analyses were performed to examine the effect of variable ASL definitions. Results: Fifty-two patients (2.7%) had proximal ASL, and 99 (5.2%) had proximal ACN. Of the 52 patients with proximal ASL, 27 (52%) had no distal polyps. Of the 99 patients with proximal ACN, 40 (40%) had no distal polyps. Age and type of distal adenomas were significantly associated with proximal ACN. There were no significant associations between distal polyp type and proximal ASL. In secondary analyses, distal SSA/Ps (P = .008) but not distal hyperplastic polyps or conventional adenomas were associated with any proximal SSA/P. Conclusions: The findings at flexible sigmoidoscopy that traditionally serve as indications for colonoscopy (conventional adenomas) are likely to be ineffective for detection of proximal ASL. This finding, plus the observation that most patients with proximal ASL have no distal polyps, favors screening colonoscopy over sigmoidoscopy, especially in the elderly. The observation that non-advanced distal SSA/Ps are associated with any proximal SSA/P warrants further study.

Prevalence and predictive factors of colorectal sessile serrated lesions in younger individuals

Prevalence and risk factors for sessile serrated lesions in an average risk colorectal cancer screening population

Sessile serrated lesion prevalence and factors associated with their detection: a post-hoc analysis of a multinational randomized controlled trial from Asia

Risk Factors for Sessile Serrated Lesions among Chinese Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy.

Clinicopathologic and endoscopic features of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas: a large inpatient population-based study in China

Patient and Physician Factors Associated with Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates

Healthy Lifestyle and the Risk of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps: Findings from a Large Colonoscopy Screening Population

Current sessile serrated lesion incidence: implications for future clinical practice

Clinical and endoscopic characteristics of sessile serrated lesions with dysplasia/carcinoma

Usefulness of analyzing endoscopic features in identifying the colorectal serrated sessile lesions with and without dysplasia

Current progress on the endoscopic features of colorectal sessile serrated lesions

Location of colorectal adenomas and serrated polyps in patients under age 50

IDDF2019-ABS-0243 Prevalence of Serrated Lesions in Average-Risk Population Receiving Colonoscopy Screening: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Association between serrated polyps and the risk of synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk individuals

IDDF2021-ABS-0025 Discriminating Endoscopic Features of Sessile Serrated Lesions: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Different modifiable risk factors for the development of non-advanced adenoma, advanced adenomatous lesion, and sessile serrated lesions, on screening colonoscopy

Histology subtypes and polyp size are associated with synchronous colorectal carcinoma of colorectal serrated polyps: a study of 499 serrated polyps.

Findings in the distal colorectum are not associated with proximal advanced serrated lesions

Serrated polyps and the risk of synchronous colorectal advanced neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Risk factors for serrated polyps: results from a large, multicenter colonoscopy-based study

Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Removal of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps