Responses to External Repeated Perturbations Vary With Time Intervals

Dongwon Kim,Jong-Moon Hwang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/thms.2024.3426302
2024-09-21
IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems
Abstract:It is generally accepted that stimuli with different time intervals lead to different contributions of relevant learning substrates. We investigated postural responses in men to trains of perturbations with different time intervals. A total of 12 male volunteers with no neurological deficits (age: 33.33±3.12 S.D.) experienced a sequence of perturbations. Two sequences of perturbations by a translational plate to still standing participants in the anterior-posterior direction were designed and administered: the first sequence consisted of 24 repeated perturbations with an interval of 5 s, while the second sequence consisted of ones with an interval of 2.5 s. A perturbation of a smaller magnitude was inserted into each sequence as a catch trial. We found that while a shorter interval and a longer interval both led to the learning effect (P < 0.05), a shorter interval results in a stiff strategy, presumably through muscle cocontraction, minimizing the degree of body sway. The learned motor response continued after experiencing the catch trial (P < 0.05). The results imply that stimulus intervals could lead to a different adaptation mechanism in the neuromotor system in the way to regain postural stability. Also, our results suggest that training for male individuals with repetition of postural perturbations with a shorter time interval leads to a stiff strategy with a greater degree. A stiff strategy could lower the ability to cope with unexpected postural threats, possibly leading to falls.
computer science, cybernetics, artificial intelligence
What problem does this paper attempt to address?