Abstract:Abstract Background In 2015, a decision was made to implement clinical pathways in Norwegian mental health services. The idea was to construct pathways similar to those used in cancer treatment. These pathways are based on diagnosis and evidence-based medicine and have strict timeframes for the different procedures. The purpose of this article is to provide a thorough examination of the formulation of the pathway “mental illness, adults” in Norwegian mental health services. In recent decades, much research has examined the implementations and outcomes of different mental health sector reforms and services in Western societies. However, there has been a lack of research on the process and creation of these reforms and/or services, particularly how they emerge as constructs in the contexts of policy, profession and practice. Methods A qualitative single case study design was employed. A text and document analysis was performed in which 52 articles and opinion pieces, 30 public hearing responses and 8 political documents and texts were analysed to identify the main actors in the discourse of mental health services and to enable a replication of their affiliated institutional logics and their views concerning the clinical pathway. Additionally, ten qualitative interviews were performed with members of the work group responsible for designating the pathway “mental illness, adults”. Results This article shows how the two main actor groups, “Mental health professionals” and “Politicians”, are guided by values associated with a specific logic when understanding the concept of a clinical pathway (CP). The findings show that actors within the political field believe in control and efficiency, in contrast to actors in mental health services, who are guided by values of discretion and autonomy. This leads to a debate on the concept of CPs and mental health services. The discussion becomes polarized between concern for patients and concern for efficiency. The making of the pathway is led by the Directorate of Health, with health professionals operating in the political domain and who have knowledge of the values of both logics, which were taken into consideration when formulating the pathways, and explains how the pathway became a complex negotiation process between the two logics and where actors on both sides were able to retain their core values. Ultimately, the number of pathways was reduced from 22 to 9. The final “Pathway for mental illness, adults” was a general pathway involving several groups of patients. The pathway explains the process from diagnosis through treatment and finalizing treatment. The different steps involve time frames that need to be coded, requiring more rigid administrative work for compliance, but without stating specific diagnostic tools or preferred treatment strategies. Conclusions This article shows that there is also a downside of having sense making guided by strong values associated with a specific institutional logic when constructing new, and hopefully better, mental health care services. This article demonstrates how retaining values sometimes becomes more crucial than engaging in constructive debates about how to solve issues of importance within the field of mental health care.

Patient pathways in primary health care – an interview study across various health care personnel in a Canadian and a Norwegian county

Disease-specific clinical pathways - are they feasible in primary care? A mixed-methods study

Patient Experiences and Digital Involvement in Patient-Centred Care Models

Explorative Study on the Utilization of Patient Pathways in Finnish Public Healthcare

How to Enhance Digital Support for Cross-Organisational Health Care Teams? A User-Based Explorative Study

Digitalising Coordination Information in Long-Term Care: Experiences from an Innovation Project

Patient, family member and caregiver engagement in shaping policy for primary health care teams in three Canadian Provinces

Continuity of care in general practice in Norway

Reflections of nurses and primary healthcare managers on integrating hospital at home into public primary healthcare services: a Norwegian focus group study

Organizing as negotiation: the construction of a pathway in Norwegian mental health services

Social inequality in navigating the healthcare maze: Care trajectories from hospital to home via intermediate care for older people in Norway

Implementing a Standardized Care Pathway Integrating Oncology, Palliative Care and Community Care in a Rural Region of Mid-Norway

The challenges of primary health care nurse leaders in the wake of New Health Care Reform in Norway

Flipping healthcare by including the patient perspective in integrated care pathway design: A scoping review

Access to primary health care: perspectives of primary care physicians and community stakeholders

Barriers to healthy transitions between nursing homes and emergency departments

Public experiences and perspectives of primary care in Canada: results from a cross-sectional survey

Pharmaceutical Care in Primary Healthcare—A Study of Nurses', Pharmacists', and Physicians' Experiences of Interprofessional Collaboration

Experiences of an interprofessional follow-up program in primary care practice

Building Collaborative Capacity through formalized and Imposed Cooperation: The Implementation of Health Care Communities in Norway

Assessing the role of GPs in Nordic health care systems