Abstract:Background: The NORDeHEALTH project studies patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs) in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Such country comparisons require an analysis of the sociotechnical context of these services. Although sociotechnical analyses of PAEHR services have been carried out in the past, a framework specifically tailored to in-depth cross-country analysis has not been developed. Objective: This study aims to develop and evaluate a method for a sociotechnical analysis of PAEHRs that advances a framework for sociotechnical analysis of eHealth solutions first presented by Sittig and Singh. This first article in a series presents the development of the method and a cross-country comparison of the contextual factors that enable PAEHR access and use. Methods: The dimensions of the framework for sociotechnical analysis were thoroughly discussed and extended in a series of workshops with international stakeholders, all being eHealth researchers focusing on PAEHRs. All countries were represented in the working group to make sure that important national perspectives were covered. A spreadsheet with relevant questions related to the studied services and the various dimensions of the sociotechnical framework was constructed and distributed to the 4 participating countries, and the project participants researched various national sources to provide the relevant data for the comparisons in the 10 sociotechnical dimensions. Results: In total, 3 dimensions were added to the methodology of Sittig and Singh to separate clinical content from features and functions of PAEHRs and demonstrate basic characteristics of the different countries regarding national and regional steering of health care and information and communications technology developments. The final framework contained the following dimensions: metadata; hardware and software computing infrastructure; features and functions; clinical content shared with patients; human-computer interface; people; workflow and communication; the health care organization's internal policies, procedures, and culture; national rules, regulations, and incentives; system measurement and monitoring; and health care system context. The dimensions added during the study mostly concerned background information needed for cross-country comparisons in particular. Several similarities were identified among the compared countries, especially regarding hardware and software computing infrastructure. All countries had, for example, one national access point, and patients are provided a PAEHR automatically. Most of the differences could be identified in the health care system context dimension. One important difference concerned the governing of information and communications technology development, where different levels (state, region, and municipality) were responsible in different countries. Conclusions: This is the first large-scale international sociotechnical analysis of services for patients to access their electronic health records; this study compared services in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. A methodology for such an analysis was developed and is presented to enable comparison studies in other national contexts to enable future implementations and evaluations of PAEHRs.

A Paradigm Shift: Sharing Patient Reported Outcome via a National Infrastructure

My care pathways - creating open innovation in healthcare

Digitalising Coordination Information in Long-Term Care: Experiences from an Innovation Project

Patient perspectives on digital patient reported outcomes in routine care of inflammatory bowel disease

Implementation of patient‐reported outcomes for people living with HIV: Insights from patients and healthcare providers in a Danish outpatient clinic

Bridging technology and care: integrating web-based PROMs in mental health services for refugees: a study on clinician training and technology adoption

Nordic Citizens' Willingness to Share Digital Health Data

Sociotechnical Cross-Country Analysis of Contextual Factors That Impact Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records in 4 European Countries: Framework Evaluation Study

Translation and cultural adaption of the emergency department-consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (ED CAPHS)-A questionnaire to measure patient experience in Denmark

Sharing for Caring? A Patients' and Clinicians' View on Handling Personal Medical Data in the Context of Digitization: An Exploratory Study

MSK Engage: A comprehensive program for collection of patient reported outcomes at scale.

Feedback of aggregate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data to clinicians and hospital end users: findings from an Australian codesign workshop process

Collecting pieces for the 'puzzle': Nurses' intraprofessional collaboration in the hospital‐to‐home transition of older patients

Patients' Experiences With Digitalization in the Health Care System: Qualitative Interview Study

Sociodemographic, personal, and disease-related determinants of referral to patient-reported outcome-based follow-up of remote outpatients: a prospective cohort study

How digital health documentation transforms professional practices in primary healthcare in Denmark: A WPR document analysis

Digitalisation of municipal healthcare collaboration with volunteers: a case study applying normalization process theory

Nationwide citizen access to their health data: analysing and comparing experiences in Denmark, Estonia and Australia

Patients' Experiences of Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: National Patient Survey in Sweden

Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collected Via Web Applications and Mobile Apps Into a Nation-Wide COVID-19 Research Platform Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources: Development Study

Factors Influencing Development and Implementation of Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records—A Comparative Study of Sweden and the Netherlands