Abstract:George Santayana once said that the nineteenth century was a divided century; that while it dreamt with Rousseau and speculated with Kant, it moved forward with Marx, Darwin, and Nietzsche. The split which Santayana regards as a characteristic of the century is reflected in virtually all fields of knowledge, above all in philosophy and literature. In philosophy—at least idealistic philosophy—the age-old question whether and to what extent reality and the concept of reality are in accord was posed with renewed intensity and with ever greater urgency, as the century proceeded. In literature the same question arose at the beginning of the century as a split between reality and imagination or between life and the writer's vision of life. The tension between the external object and the inner vision of the artist, which for centuries had been the very substance of art, seemed suddenly eliminated, the invisible cord broken. The word "split," Zerrissenheit, became in Germany a literary slogan, while in France one or the other poet drew the conclusion from this situation and chose the ivory tower as his favourite retreat. All writers and poets felt the split. Many of them did regain the balance by not identifying themselves with their age, thus retrieving the fruitful tension and retaining their individuality, and they explored the rapidly changing world in a variety of ways, seriously or ironically, in praise or in condemnation. But for others, and with them we are concerned here, the split widened and deepened into an abyss. No longer able to rely fully on the old world, and yet disliking the new and coming changes to the point of ignoring them, they created a world of their own. It was a world which consisted in an estrangement from humanity and the love of humanity. At the same time it affords an interesting even fascinating insight into border-cases of experience in art and in life.

Splitting, Confusion, and Hope

Belonging on the Edge

The laws of division

Coexistence or Splits: on Clash of Civilization from Sociology

Splitting Atomic Minds: Hanna Segal and the Fear of Nuclear War in 1980s Britain

Splitting-Off and Outsourcing the Social in Dollaria

Dynamics of Affective Polarization: From Consensus to Partisan Divides

Fear of Breakdown and Object Usage: Confronting and Surviving Destructiveness, with Some Help from the Maternal

A theoretical framework for polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society

Polarization in North America: European Perspectives

Affiliation vs. Alienation

Unhinged: A Prospective Perspective on Being Unsafe1

Removing Boundaries to Enhance Communication Between People

United v.s. Divided, Deconfinement of Social Tension as a Topological Phase Transition

Divided we fall: Constructive dialoguing about our political differences within family therapy training

Two perspectives on family rifts: the concepts of estrangement and cut‐off

Dissenting colleagues; power, alienation, vulnerability

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Group Decision Making and Beyond 1. Echo Chambers and Random Polarization

From Poe to Kafka

Making Sense of Schizoposting

In This Issue, Psychoanalytic Dialogues 34-5