Abstract:Introduction: Interpretability is a key challenge for researchers, clinicians, and patients interested in using the output of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments. When rich and detailed meaning is required to assist individual patients to make treatment choices we propose that the item content of psychometric rating scales should be better leveraged to improve interpretability. Methods: Modern psychometric methods such as Rasch measurement theory allow PRO users to map patient progress up or down a scale over time to item benchmarks. These benchmarks represent the relative difficulty associated with each item contained in a scale. The most difficult items benchmark the best overall outcome on a scale and the least difficult items represent the worst overall outcome. The group-level effects of different treatment options can also be mapped to item benchmarks and compared with those of individual patients. Discussion: The proposed method leverages the content already available in PRO instruments to improve interpretation. This approach locates both individuals (in this instance breast cancer patients undergoing surgery) and treatments (in this instance breast reconstruction techniques), on a hierarchy of health variables where each variable represents a progressively more advanced step in the recovery process. The approach can specify the aspects of a health concept where patients are currently competent, and the aspects which they might gain from a new treatment. It can also assist attempts by industry to communicate specific treatment benefits to their target audience. Key points: The method is best applied when patients need guidance about the likely benefits of different treatment options, when a PRO instrument has been developed using a modern psychometric method such as Rasch measurement theory, when there is good evidence from well-conducted studies of the group-level benefits of different treatment options, and these benefits have been measured using appropriate PROs. The method depends on good "fit" of individual patient responses to an underlying model. However, even when fit is poor it may be useful for patients to understand the "ladder" of health achievements for their condition (from the perspective of the average patient) and where different treatment options sit on this ladder.

Why (not) rely on patients' perspectives? Time for a meaningful standard to measure and define patient-specific change in clinical psychology.

Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research.

Commentary on "When (not) to rely on the reliable change index".

Significant individual change should be used as a lower bound for anchor based estimates of meaningful change on patient-reported outcome scores

Measuring True Change in Individual Patients: Reliable Change Indices of Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes, and Implications for Quality Indicators

Assessing Clinical Significance: Proposed Extensions to Method

Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State and Substantial Clinical Benefit Matter Most to Patients and Must Be Reported Correctly

Radical Thinking: Scientific Rigor and Pragmatism

A Rasch Measurement Theory Approach to Improve the Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes

Validity of clinically significant change classifications yielded by Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods

Clinical Significance Methods: A Comparison of Statistical Techniques

Establishment of a reliable change index for the GAD-7

Challenges in applying minimal clinically important difference: a critical review

Fair assessment of the merits of psychiatric research

Patient-centricity in digital measure development: co-evolution of best practice and regulatory guidance

The Duration-Adjusted Reliable Change Index: Defining Clinically Relevant Symptom Changes of Varying Durations

Abandoning personalization to get to precision in the pharmacotherapy of depression

Editorial Commentary: Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Threshold Scores to Estimate Patient Satisfaction: 'Let's Ask the Patient!'

Precision Psychiatry Implementation in Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinical Practice: Opportunities and Challenges

Assessing measurement in health: Beyond reliability and validity

Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures