Abstract:Digital health technologies (DHTs) have the potential to modernize drug development and clinical trial operations by remotely, passively, and continuously collecting ecologically valid evidence that is meaningful to patients' lived experiences. Such evidence holds potential for all drug development stakeholders, including regulatory agencies, as it will help create a stronger evidentiary link between approval of new therapeutics and the ultimate aim of improving patient lives. However, only a very small number of novel digital measures have matured from exploratory usage into regulatory qualification or efficacy endpoints. This shows that despite the clear potential, actually gaining regulatory agreement that a new measure is both fit-for-purpose and delivers value remains a serious challenge. One of the key stumbling blocks for developers has been the requirement to demonstrate that a digital measure is meaningful to patients. This viewpoint aims to examine the co-evolution of regulatory guidance in the United States (U.S.) and best practice for integration of DHTs into the development of clinical outcome assessments. Contextualizing guidance on meaningfulness within the larger shift towards a patient-centric drug development approach, this paper reviews the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance and existing literature surrounding the development of meaningful digital measures and patient engagement, including the recent examples of rejections by the FDA that further emphasize patient-centricity in digital measures. Finally, this paper highlights remaining hurdles and provides insights into the established frameworks for development and adoption of digital measures in clinical research.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to ensure that the Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs) generated by digital health technologies (DHTs) are of practical significance to patients in the development of DHTs, so as to obtain the recognition of regulatory agencies and finally be widely used in drug development and clinical trials. Although DHTs have great potential in remotely, passively and continuously collecting valid evidence reflecting patients' real - life experiences, at present only a few new digital measurement tools have matured from the exploratory use stage to the regulatory qualification or efficacy endpoint stage. This indicates that, despite the obvious potential, there are still significant challenges in obtaining regulatory agency recognition that new measurement tools are both fit - for - purpose and valuable, especially in demonstrating that these digital measurements are meaningful to patients. By analyzing the guidelines of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and existing literature, the paper explores how to incorporate a patient - centered approach in the development process of digital measurement tools, emphasizes various methodologies required for establishing meaningful digital measurements, and discusses the progress made, the obstacles faced and future directions.

Patient-centricity in digital measure development: co-evolution of best practice and regulatory guidance