Abstract:Questions around the technical and political feasibility of deep mitigation scenarios assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have increasingly been raised as have calls for more directly analyzing and incorporating aspects of justice and fairness. Simultaneously, models are increasing the technical representation of novel carbon-dioxide removal (CDR) approaches to provide policy-relevant analyses of mitigation portfolios in the context of the rising number of net-zero CO2 and GHG targets made by parties to the Paris Agreement. Still, in most cost-effective mitigation scenarios developed by Integrated Assessment Models, a significant portion of mitigation is assumed to take place in developing regions. We address these intersecting questions through analyzing scenarios that include Direct Air Capture of CO2 with Storage (DACCS), a novel CDR technology that is not dependent on land potential and can be deployed widely, as well as regional variations in institutional capacity for mitigation based on country-level governance indicators. We find that including novel CDR and representations of institutional capacity can enhance both the feasibility and fairness of 2°C and 1.5°C high-overshoot scenarios, especially in the near term, with institutional capacity playing a stronger role than the presence of additional carbon removal methods. However, our results indicate that new CDR methods being studied by models are not likely to change regional mitigation outcomes of scenarios which achieve the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement. Thus, while engineering carbon removals like DACCS may play a significant role by midcentury, gross emissions reductions in mitigation pathways arriving at net-zero CO2 emissions in line with 1.5°C do not substantially change. Our results highlight that further investment and development of novel CDR is critical for post-net-zero CO2 mitigation, but that equitable achievement of this milestone will need to arrive through technical and financial transfers, rather than by substantial carbon removals in developed countries.

Current national proposals are off track to meet carbon dioxide removal needs

The carbon dioxide removal gap

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5C

Over-reliance on land for carbon dioxide removal in net-zero climate pledges

Key uncertainties behind global projections of direct air capture deployment

Moving toward Net-Zero Emissions Requires New Alliances for Carbon Dioxide Removal

Land-use Emissions Play a Critical Role in Land-Based Mitigation for Paris Climate Targets

Efforts-sharing to Achieve the Paris Goals: Ratcheting-up of NDCs and Taking Full Advantage of International Carbon Market

The complementary role of carbon dioxide removal: A catalyst for advancing the COP28 pledges towards the 1.5 °C Paris Agreement target

Prioritizing Non-Carbon Dioxide Removal Mitigation Strategies Could Reduce the Negative Impacts Associated with Large-Scale Reliance on Negative Emissions

Between Scylla and Charybdis: Delayed mitigation narrows the passage between large-scale CDR and high costs

National GHG Emissions Reduction Pledges and 2°C: Comparison of Studies

Carbon dioxide removal technologies are not born equal

Fairness and feasibility in deep mitigation pathways with novel carbon dioxide removal considering institutional capacity to mitigate

Exploring Fair and Ambitious Mitigation Contributions under the Paris Agreement Goals

CO2 removal and 1.5°C: what, when, where, and how?

The role of carbon capture, utilization, and storage for economic pathways that limit global warming to below 1.5°C

Global mitigation efforts cannot neglect emerging emitters

On the Chances of Staying below the 1.5°C Warming Target

Pathways for Balancing CO2 Emissions and Sinks

Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy in the Making: Assessing Developments in 9 OECD Cases