Abstract:Vibrotactile stimuli can be effective as warning signals, but their effectiveness as directional take-over requests in automated driving is yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate the correct response rate, reaction times, and eye and head orientation for static versus dynamic directional take-over requests presented via vibrating motors in the driver seat. In a driving simulator, eighteen participants performed three sessions: 1) a session involving no driving (Baseline), 2) driving a highly automated car without additional task (HAD), and 3) driving a highly automated car while performing a mentally demanding task (N-Back). Per session, participants received four directional static (in the left or right part of the seat) and four dynamic (moving from one side towards the opposite left or right of the seat) take-over requests via two 6×4 motor matrices embedded in the seat back and bottom. In the Baseline condition, participants reported whether the cue was left or right, and in the HAD and N-Back conditions participants had to change lanes to the left or to the right according to the directional cue. The correct response rate was operationalized as the accuracy of the self-reported direction (Baseline session) and the accuracy of the lane change direction (HAD & N-Back sessions). The results showed that the correct response rate ranged between 94% for static patterns in the Baseline session and 74% for dynamic patterns in the N-Back session, although these effects were not statistically significant. Steering wheel touch and steering input reaction times were approximately 200ms faster for static patterns than for dynamic ones. Eye tracking results revealed a correspondence between head/eye-gaze direction and lane change direction, and showed that head and eye-gaze movements where initiated faster for static vibrations than for dynamic ones. In conclusion, vibrotactile stimuli presented via the driver seat are effective as warnings, but their effectiveness as directional take-over requests may be limited. The present study may encourage further investigation into how to get drivers safely back into the loop.

Comparing Shape-Changing and Vibro-Tactile Steering Wheels for Take-Over Requests in Highly Automated Driving

To Inform or to Instruct? An Evaluation of Meaningful Vibrotactile Patterns to Support Automated Vehicle Takeover Performance

Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat

HapWheel: Bringing In-Car Controls to Driver’s Fingertips by Embedding Ubiquitous Haptic Displays into a Steering Wheel

Creating Tactile Interaction Surfaces for the Origo Steering Wheel Concept using CWI and EHWs

Human–Machine Collaboration for Automated Driving Using an Intelligent Two‐Phase Haptic Interface

Vibrotactile Displays: A Survey With a View on Highly Automated Driving

Design of steering wheel torque with human-machine interaction for uncoupled shared steering

Acceptance and Usability of a Soft Robotic, Haptic Feedback Seat for Autonomy Level Transitions in Highly Automated Vehicles

A user study of directional tactile and auditory user interfaces for take-over requests in conditionally automated vehicles

Human-Machine Collaboration for Automated Vehicles via an Intelligent Two-Phase Haptic Interface

Subjective Contribution of Vibrotactile Modality in Addition to or Instead of Auditory Modality for Takeover Notification in an Autonomous Vehicle

Automated Driving Systems: Impact of Haptic Guidance on Driving Performance after a Take Over Request

Cognitive task analysis-driven intelligent steering wheel interaction design

Haptic Feedback for the Transfer of Control in Autonomous Vehicles

Toward Hazard or Action? Effects of Directional Vibrotactile Takeover Requests on Takeover Performance in Automated Driving

HapWheel: In-Car Infotainment System Feedback Using Haptic and Hovering Techniques

Analysis of Human-Machine Cooperation When Driving with Different Degrees of Haptic Shared Control

Communication and Interaction With Semiautonomous Ground Vehicles by Force Control Steering