Abstract:The Grand Strategy of the United States, including its strategy toward China, has always been the product of the interaction of geopolitics and domestic politics. After the Cold War, with the end of the bipolar structure of the international system and the increasing polarization of domestic politics in the United States, the impact of geopolitics on the formulation of the foreign policy of the United States has been weakened to some degree, while the spillover effect of domestic politics has weighed more heavily than before. This change could be explained in the way that while two opposing trends of Partisan Realignment began to emerge in the post-financial crisis era in the United States, the elites from both Democratic and Republican Parties had often focused on the preferences of their core political coalition as basis in foreign policy making, in order to further their own respective political interests. In regard to the American strategy toward China, with the deepening of the structural contradictions between China and the United States as well as changes in their respective external strategic choices, geopolitics became the primary logic in the formulation of American strategy toward China since 2009, thus the “strategic competition” has become the dominant mode of bilateral relations. In the view of Washington, China and the United States have formed a competitive relationship in the areas relating to the core interests of the United States, such as economy, security, values and the dominance of the existing international order. However, the questions of reality, such as how to compete with China and how to decide the priorities of their own core interests, are defined by demands of core political coalitions represented by the elites from both Democratic and Republican Parties in the context of a new round of Partisan Realignment. From Obama to Trump, different domestic political logics made the focus of American strategy toward China shifted from “institution–values” competition based on globalism to “economy–security” competition based on nationalism. Therefore, the changes in American domestic politics will present an important channel through which the orientation of American strategy toward China would be clearly observed in the future.

Temporal Theory and US-China Relations

Defining China–US Strategic Competition: Partisan Realignment and the Domestic Political Logic of Change in American Strategy Toward China, 2009–2020

Ideational Differences, Perception Gaps, and the Emerging Sino–US Rivalry

Uncertainty, Cooperation and US-China Relations:A Survey Experiment on Conflictual Possibilities Between Great Powers

From Economic Cooperation to Strategic Competition: Understanding the US-China Trade Disputes through the Transformed Relations

Great Power Competition: Lessons from the Past, Implications for the Future

It’s not a cold war: competition and cooperation in US–China relations

The logic of China–US rivalry

The United States in a World of Great Power Competition

Chinese perspectives on the US-China rivalry: navigating geo-economic and technological tensions in a new era of global statism

From Partnership to Rivalry: China and the USA in the Early Twenty-First Century

Historical Insights of Global Power Transitions: Implications on US-China Relations

Is a New Cold War Inevitable? Chinese Perspectives on US–China Strategic Competition

China's Trade Relations with the United States in Perspective

What Can History Reveal about the Future of Sino-American Relations?-Retrospect, Reflections, and Prospects

The Instability of China-US Relations

Decoding US–China Strategic Competition: Comparative Leverages and Issue Selection

The US factor in post-cold war China–Russia relations

The future of US-China relations: a scientific investigation

From Strategic Ambiguity to Maximum Pressure? Explaining the Logic of the US Taiwan Policy in the Post–Cold War Era

Technology, power, and uncontrolled great power strategic competition between China and the United States