Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Solid Organ transplant recipients to predict active disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies

Dafna Yahav,Melissa R Gitman,Ili Margalit,Tomer Avni,Mariska M G Leeflang,Shahid Husain
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad324
2023-07-05
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Abstract Background This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies to assess the predictive value of both TST and IGRA for active TB among SOT recipients. Methods Medline, Embase, and the CENTRAL databases were searched from 1946 until June 30, 2022. Two independent assessors extracted data from studies. Sensitivity analyses were performed to investigate the effect of studies with high or low risk of bias. Methodological quality of each publication was assessed using QUADAS-2. Results A total of 43 studies (36,403 patients) with patients who were screened for LTBI and who underwent SOT were included; 18 were comparative and 25 non-comparative (19 TST, 6 QFT-GIT). For IGRA tests taken together, PPV and NPV were 1.2% and 99.6%, respectively. For TST, PPV was 2.13% and NPV was 95.5%. Overall, PPV is higher when TB burden is higher, regardless of test type, though still low in absolute terms. Incidence of active TB was similar between studies using LTBI prophylaxis (mean incidence 1.22%, 95% CI 0.2179 to 2.221) and those not using prophylaxis (1.045, 0.2731 to 1.817, (p-value 0.7717). Strengths of this study include the large number of studies available from multiple different countries; limitations include absence of gold standard for diagnosis of latent TB and low incidence of active TB. Conclusions we found both TST and IGRA had a low PPV and high NPV for the development of active TB post-transplant. Further studies are needed to better understand how to prevent active TB in the SOT population.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?