Quantiferon Testing is Superior to Tuberculosis Skin Test (tst) in Identifying Latent Tb in Immunosuppressed Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Decision Analysis

Arun Swaminath,Nahid Bhadelia,Claire Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/00000434-201210001-01699
2012-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: Inflammatory bowel disease can require immunosuppression with Anti-TNFαtherapy. Anti-TNFα drugs can reactivate latent TB. Current guidelines recommend screening for latent TB, but do not specify a strategy. Immunosuppressed IBD patients are frequently anergic to TB skin test (TST). Most patients in the US are screened using a TST and chest X-ray, though interferon gamma release assays (IGRA) such as Quantiferon, have now been FDA approved for identifying latent TB. We compared the performance of TST and Quantiferon for screening latent TB based on population prevalence, risk of death from reactivation TB, and costs associated with false (-) tests. Methods: We constructed a decision analytic model to compare outcomes and costs of using TST or IGRA in an immunosuppressed IBD population. Parameters were obtained from the published literature. The base case was a 35 year old U.S. born male with Crohn's disease maintained on 40 mg prednisone awaiting infliximab therapy. We performed sensitivity analysis on population prevalence of latent TB, costs, and sensitivity of the TST and Quantiferon assay. The model was limited to 1 year of follow up and we assumed no competing risks for mortality in the person being treated. Results: Using the base case scenario, per 1000 patients screened, the Quantiferon strategy resulted in 0.529 deaths from TB reactivation compared to 1.92 deaths using TST. The Quantiferon strategy results in 1.85 TB reactivations vs. 6.7 TB reactivations using TST. The model was not sensitive to background prevalence of latent TB. The cost of Quantiferon would have to more than double in order for the TST to be the cheaper screening option (Figure 1). The sensitivity of the TST would have to increase by a factor of 4 before it would become the cheaper screening option.Figure 1: No Caption available.Conclusion: Under a broad range of assumptions for prevalence of latent TB, costs of TST and Quantiferon, as well sensitivity of either test in immunosuppressed IBD population, the Quantiferon strategy dominates the TST strategy. Consideration should be given to having Quantiferon as the preferred method of identifying latent TB in all immunosuppressed IBD patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?