Sambo tills döden skiljer oss åt? - en studie om sambors avsaknad av arvsrätt och begränsade efterlevandeskydd
Julia Forser
Abstract:The purpose of this thesis is to investigate whether or not it is justifiable that cohabiting partners don’t inherit from each other, given that married couples do. Furthermore, I am going to discuss cohabiting partners’ provision for surviving lex ferenda. Towards this purpose I will look into current survivorship legislation that affects cohabiting partners as well as married couples, how it can be improved, the motivations behind the lack of a right for cohabitants to inherit from each other, and how cohabitation has changed since the motivations.
Cohabitants are currently not entitled to inherit from one another. If a cohabitant is deceased, the legal order of succession will apply, which the surviving cohabitant is not a part of. Instead, other provisions for surviving are offered. In addition to the right to property division that is provided for the surviving cohabitant, there is a right that establishes a minimum monetary grant that the surviving cohabitant has the right to receive from the couple’s property settlement, as well as a right to obtain the housing in certain situations. Moreover, the surviving cohabitant himself can extend the provisions for surviving by entering an agreement with the heirs to not split the decedent's estate. Also, the cohabitants can make sure to provide for each other through the writing of a will. Spouses, however, automatically inherit from each other, and compared to the provisions for surviving they benefit from, the protection that cohabitants may obtain seems very limited. There are several possible ways to extend these provisions for cohabitants. The property division rules can be extended, cohabitants can be allowed to make agreements about what property to divide in the first place, the minimum grant for the surviving cohabitant can be larger, and the right to dispose of one’s possessions through a will can be extended. An additional way of improving the survivorship legislation for cohabitants would be to implement a right to inherit from each other. One of my research questions examined the motivation behind the lack of a right for cohabitants to inherit from each other. The decision not to implement such a right was made in 1987, when establishing the former law applying to cohabitants, and as such, the decision was based upon living conditions in that era. In order to enable an analysis regarding whether or not it is justifiable that cohabitants don’t inherit from each other, I investigated if cohabitation has changed since the decision was made not to implement the right for cohabitants to inherit from each other. I found that cohabitation has changed since then: among other things, cohabitation is more common and increasing among higher age groups, even though this life choice still tends to be more temporary than marriages.
I advise the survivorship legislation for cohabitants to be extended to letting them dispose of their possessions more freely through a will. Namely, my suggestion is that the freedom to divide through a will should be extended to include the cohabitants’ mutual children’s statutory share of inheritance. However, I didn’t find the existing research to be extensive enough to grant cohabitants a legal right to inherit from each other based on it, since there isn’t enough research to conclude whether or not cohabitants wish to inherit from each other at all, nor in what situations or to what extent. Thus I found that based on the existing research, cohabitants’ lack of a legal right to inherit from each other is justifiable.
Law,Sociology