Unmarried Cohabitation: Options, Limits and Possibilities

Sotirios Sarantakos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1034652x.1994.11004477
1994-11-01
Australian Journal of Marriage and Family
Abstract:Using data from Australian and overseas longitudinal studies extending over a quarter of a century, this paper (a) explores the construction and ideological Justification of liberation and the social and ideological contexts with which liberation is usually connected; (b) examines the views of cohabiting couples and marrieds with and without cohabital experience; and (b) evaluates the extent to which liberation constitutes an element of modem cohabitation. It finally addresses the question about who benefited from the cohabital experience: the cohabiting couple, marriage as an institution or the state. The paper concludes that conditioning, structural and ideological changes and legal reforms, which were introduced recently in the various Australian states, have transformed cohabitation from an alternative to matrimony to a preparation step to marriage, and have significantly reduced every chance to construct a liberated dyadic life style. Consequently, for the liberated Australians who wish to establish a dyadic relationship there is no freedom of choice: the only available option is marriage; and the only beneficiary is the state.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?