Abstract:Background and aim: A sessile multicellular organism that is immersed in a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances and has its cells firmly attached to a surface is referred to as a microbial biofilm. When it comes to pulp and periradicular pathosis, biofilms are crucial. To reduce the number of microorganisms in the root canal and assist in treating periapical pathosis, endodontic therapy must include decontamination of the system of tooth root canals through biomechanical preparation and irrigation of the root canal. This study compares sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, curcumin, and triphala as endodontic irrigating solutions regarding their capacity to eliminate biofilm from root canals. Materials and methods: A total of 60 patients were included if they had pulpitis. Two specific samples (samples A and B) were chosen for analysis from a collection of samples so that their bacterial composition is most similar to that of acute pulpitis. The suspensions of bacterial cells from this polymicrobial culture have been collected from frozen stock and then regrown by inoculation on Columbia agar base (Basingstoke, UK) with the addition of vitamin K1, hemin, and 5% (v/v) calf blood. The pureness of the suspensions was assessed using colony morphology and Gram staining. Analytical profile index (API) 20A tests or automated test for bacteria (ATB) ID 32A tests were initially used to identify the isolates. These polymicrobial cultures' in vitro biofilms were developed using membrane filters made of cellulose nitrate. The tested irrigating solutions were as follows: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 10% triphala, 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 10% povidone-iodine, and 5% curcumin (CUR). On the other hand, phosphate-buffered saline was taken as a control agent. Results: As the standard of excellence in endodontic irrigation, NaOCl has eliminated all germs in sample A following 15 minutes of culture and in both of the specimens after 40 minutes. Iodine also eliminated all germs after 40 minutes of administration, indicating that it would be worth exploring using iodine as a potential endodontic irrigant. Iodine achieved total bacterial elimination after 40 minutes in both samples; however, it was less effective after 15 minutes. Our findings indicate that iodine solution is the most suitable alternative after the supremely effective NaOCl, although it requires longer contact times to generate the necessary and recognized broad-spectrum antibacterial properties, including in the case of biofilms. Furthermore, curcumin also showed significant results after NaOCl and iodine. Conclusion: The antibacterial potency of each studied irrigant was significant, supporting their usage in endodontics. It was observed that NaOCl has the maximum antibacterial activity.

The Efficacy and Safety of Various Root Canal Irrigants and Disinfectants

Endodontic irrigants from a comprehensive perspective

Exploring Efficacy and Safety: Comparative Evaluation of Different Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Therapy at a Tertiary Care Setting

Update of the therapeutic planning of irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal treatment. A literature review

Advances in the Role of Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigant in Chemical Preparation of Root Canal Treatment

Comparative Analysis of Various Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Treatment

Effect of Chemical Debridement and Irrigant Activation on Endodontic Treatment Outcomes: An Updated Overview

Present status and future directions - irrigants and irrigation methods

The Interaction of Two Widely Used Endodontic Irrigants, Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite, and Its Impact on the Disinfection Protocol during Root Canal Treatment

Breakthrough in the Development of Endodontic Irrigants

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Efficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Against Intracanal Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Comparative Study with Traditional Endodontic Irrigation Solutions

Effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite gel and solutions in endodontics: A systematic review

Expert consensus on irrigation and intracanal medication in root canal therapy

Comparing the Biofilm Removal Capacity of NaOCl, Povidone-Iodine, Chlorhexidine, Curcumin, and Triphala as Endodontic Irrigants

A Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Different Endodontic Irrigating Solutions on Microhardness of Root Canal Dentin: An in vitro Study

Antimicrobial efficacy of photosensitized nanoparticles, diode laser, conventional, and sonic irrigation systems against enterococcus faecalis in root canals – An in vitro study

ROLE OF HERBAL EXTRACTS IN ROOT CANAL DISINFECTION AND REMOVAL OF SMEAR LAYER: A REVIEW

A Multi-Criteria Approach for Comparison of Ginger Extract and Conventional Irrigants in Root Canal Treatment

Effects of endodontic root canal irrigants on tooth dentin revealed by infrared spectroscopy: a systematic literature review

MTAD: a review of a promising endodontic irrigant

Research progress on the effect of new disinfection methods on the clearance of Enterococcus faecalis in the root canal