Abstract:Background and aim: A sessile multicellular organism that is immersed in a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances and has its cells firmly attached to a surface is referred to as a microbial biofilm. When it comes to pulp and periradicular pathosis, biofilms are crucial. To reduce the number of microorganisms in the root canal and assist in treating periapical pathosis, endodontic therapy must include decontamination of the system of tooth root canals through biomechanical preparation and irrigation of the root canal. This study compares sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, curcumin, and triphala as endodontic irrigating solutions regarding their capacity to eliminate biofilm from root canals. Materials and methods: A total of 60 patients were included if they had pulpitis. Two specific samples (samples A and B) were chosen for analysis from a collection of samples so that their bacterial composition is most similar to that of acute pulpitis. The suspensions of bacterial cells from this polymicrobial culture have been collected from frozen stock and then regrown by inoculation on Columbia agar base (Basingstoke, UK) with the addition of vitamin K1, hemin, and 5% (v/v) calf blood. The pureness of the suspensions was assessed using colony morphology and Gram staining. Analytical profile index (API) 20A tests or automated test for bacteria (ATB) ID 32A tests were initially used to identify the isolates. These polymicrobial cultures' in vitro biofilms were developed using membrane filters made of cellulose nitrate. The tested irrigating solutions were as follows: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 10% triphala, 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, 10% povidone-iodine, and 5% curcumin (CUR). On the other hand, phosphate-buffered saline was taken as a control agent. Results: As the standard of excellence in endodontic irrigation, NaOCl has eliminated all germs in sample A following 15 minutes of culture and in both of the specimens after 40 minutes. Iodine also eliminated all germs after 40 minutes of administration, indicating that it would be worth exploring using iodine as a potential endodontic irrigant. Iodine achieved total bacterial elimination after 40 minutes in both samples; however, it was less effective after 15 minutes. Our findings indicate that iodine solution is the most suitable alternative after the supremely effective NaOCl, although it requires longer contact times to generate the necessary and recognized broad-spectrum antibacterial properties, including in the case of biofilms. Furthermore, curcumin also showed significant results after NaOCl and iodine. Conclusion: The antibacterial potency of each studied irrigant was significant, supporting their usage in endodontics. It was observed that NaOCl has the maximum antibacterial activity.

A Multi-Criteria Approach for Comparison of Ginger Extract and Conventional Irrigants in Root Canal Treatment

Comparison of Antibacterial Effect and Smear Layer Removal of Herbal versus Traditional Irrigants - An in vitro Study

Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Efficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Against Intracanal Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Comparative Study with Traditional Endodontic Irrigation Solutions

Comparative Analysis of Various Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Treatment

Evaluation of Antibacterial Effects of Ginger Extract When Used as One Component of the Root Canal Sealers; (An in vitro Study)

Comparative evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration and minimal bactericidal concentration of various herbal irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis

Assessment of the Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Herbal Root Canal Irrigants (Propolis, Triphala, and Aloe Vera) and Chlorhexidine Against Enterococcus Faecalis

The Efficacy and Safety of Various Root Canal Irrigants and Disinfectants

Comparison of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Commiphora molmol and Sodium Hypochlorite as Root Canal Irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum

Exploring Efficacy and Safety: Comparative Evaluation of Different Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Therapy at a Tertiary Care Setting

Evaluation of Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigant, Bingpeng Irrigant, and Fufang Bingpeng Irrigant As Endodontic Irrigants During Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation

Comparing the Biofilm Removal Capacity of NaOCl, Povidone-Iodine, Chlorhexidine, Curcumin, and Triphala as Endodontic Irrigants

[Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Four Endodontic Irrigants Using an in Vitro Model Infected by Enterococcus Faecalis].

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Herbal Extracts against Root Canal Pathogens - An in Vitro Study

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Five Endodontic Irrigants Using an in Vitro Model Infected by Enterococcus Faecalis

Evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of Chitosan, Chlorhexidine, Propolis and Sodium hypochlorite on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm : An in vitro study

Assessment of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Triphala, Neem, and Chlorhexidine Root Canal Irrigants

Antibacterial Activity of Sodium Hypochlorite Gel versus Different Types of Root Canal Medicaments Using Agar Diffusion Test: An In Vitro Comparative Study

The Effectiveness of Three Different Irrigant Activation Methods in the Elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from Root Canals

Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of new herbal preparation with and without 17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid as a root canal irrigant in human root dentin: A systematic review

COMPARITVE STUDY OF SMEAR LAYER REMOVAL AND ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY OF SILVER, CHITOSAN NANOPARTICLES AND SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE AGAINST ENTEROFECALIS WHEN USED AS ROOT CANAL IRRIGANTS- IN VITRO STUDY