Prevalence of type 2 inflammatory signatures and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps from two phase 3 clinical trials: SINUS‐24 and SINUS‐52

Claus Bachert,Asif H. Khan,Stella E. Lee,Claire Hopkins,Anju T. Peters,Wytske Fokkens,Amy Praestgaard,Amr Radwan,Scott Nash,Juby A. Jacob‐Nara,Yamo Deniz,Paul J. Rowe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23249
2023-08-09
Abstract:Background This post hoc analysis of the international SINUS‐24/‐52 trials (NCT02912468/NCT02898454) aimed to assess dupilumab efficacy in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) according to different definitions of type 2 inflammatory signature. Methods Six definitions of type 2 inflammation were used: ≥150 eosinophils/μL or total IgE ≥100 IU/mL with a coexisting type 2 condition; ≥150 eosinophils/μL or total IgE ≥100 IU/mL; ≥150 eosinophils/μL; ≥250 eosinophils/μL or total IgE ≥100 IU/mL; coexisting asthma or ≥300 eosinophils/μL; presence of a coexisting type 2 condition. Odds ratios (ORs; dupilumab vs placebo) for achieving clinically meaningful improvement (≥1 point) from baseline to Week 24 (pooled SINUS‐24/‐52) and Week 52 (SINUS‐52) were calculated for nasal polyp score (NPS; range 0–8), nasal congestion/obstruction score (NC; 0−3), and loss of smell score (LoS; 0−3). Results At baseline (n = 724), most patients displayed a type 2 inflammatory signature across definitions (64.2% to 95.3%). At Week 24, ORs for clinically meaningful improvement ranged from 11.9 to 14.9 for NPS across type 2 definitions, 6.5 to 9.6 for NC, and 12.2 to 17.8 for LoS (all P <0.0001). OR ranges were similar or greater at Week 52: 19.0–36.6, 7.6−12.1, and 9.2−33.5, respectively (all P <0.0001). Conclusion Most patients with CRSwNP in the SINUS study had type 2 inflammation. Dupilumab demonstrated robust efficacy across definitions of type 2 inflammation, consistent with its profile as an inhibitor of IL‐4 and IL‐13 signaling, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation in CRSwNP. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?