Mild and symptom-free months in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps treated with dupilumab

Claus Bachert,Asif H Khan,Claire Hopkins,Joseph K Han,Wytske J Fokkens,Leda P Mannent,Jérôme Msihid,Kinga Borsos,Siddhesh Kamat,Scott Nash,Harry Sacks,Paul J Rowe,Yamo Deniz,Juby A Jacob-Nara
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2024.09.015
2024-09-28
Abstract:Background: Frequently reported outcomes of clinical trials in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) may have limited relatability for patients. Objective: To enhance the patient relatability of outcomes in dupilumab clinical trials for CRSwNP, daily symptom scores were used to determine new patient‑centered end points: mild-to-no-symptom months (MSM) and symptom-free months (SFM). Methods: This work is a post hoc analysis of patients receiving dupilumab 300 mg or placebo every 2 weeks for 24 weeks (SINUS-24 study; NCT02912468) or 52 weeks (SINUS‑52; NCT02898454). Patients recorded symptom severity scores daily for each of nasal congestion, loss of smell, and anterior and posterior rhinorrhea on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe). We assessed the proportions of patients reporting only MSM or SFM throughout the 28‑day period before randomization, week 24 (pooled studies), and week 52 (SINUS‑52). Results: Significantly more dupilumab‑treated than placebo-treated patients achieved MSM for all 4 symptoms (week 24: 31.0% vs 4.4%; odds ratio [OR] 12.9 [95% CI 6.4-25.8]; week 52: 38.3% vs 2.6%; OR 15.6 [5.9-41.0]; both P < .0001). In addition, significantly more dupilumab-treated than placebo‑treated patients achieved SFM for at least 1 of the 4 symptoms (week 24: 35.4% vs 10.8%; OR 4.9 [95% CI 3.1-7.8]; week 52: 50.0% vs 9.2%; OR 9.1 [95% CI 4.6-17.9]; both P < .0001). Conclusion: One-third of patients with severe CRSwNP treated with dupilumab achieved MSM for all 4 cardinal symptoms (nasal congestion, loss of smell, and anterior and posterior rhinorrhea). Moreover, half of the patients achieved SFM for at least 1 of the 4 symptoms. These results support the benefit of dupilumab in improving patient‑centered outcomes. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02912468 (SINUS-24) and NCT02898454 (SINUS-52).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?