Abstract:Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) can be summarized as follows: it inherits from proportional–integral–derivative (PID) the quality that makes it such a success: the error driven, rather than model-based, control law; it takes from modern control theory its best offering: the state observer; it embraces the power of nonlinear feedback and puts it to full use; it is a useful digital control technology developed out of an experimental platform rooted in computer simulations. ADRC is made possible only when control is taken as an experimental science, instead of a mathematical one. It is motivated by the ever increasing demands from industry that requires the control technology to move beyond PID, which has dominated the practice for over 80 years. Specifically, there are four areas of weakness in PID that we strive to address: 1) the error computation; 2) noise degradation in the derivative control; 3) oversimplification and the loss of performance in the control law in the form of a linear weighted sum; and 4) complications brought by the integral control. Correspondingly, we propose four distinct measures: 1) a simple differential equation as a transient trajectory generator; 2) a noise-tolerant tracking differentiator; 3) the nonlinear control laws; and 4) the concept and method of total disturbance estimation and rejection. Together, they form a new set of tools and a new way of control design. Times and again in experiments and on factory floors, ADRC proves to be a capable replacement of PID with unmistakable advantage in performance and practicality, providing solutions to pressing engineering problems of today. With the new outlook and possibilities that ADRC represents, we further believe that control engineering may very well break the hold of classical PID and enter a new era, an era that brings back the spirit of innovations.

Using dynamic data reconciliation to improve the performance of PID feedback control systems with Gaussian/non-Gaussian distributed disturbance and measurement noise

Research on the Control of Power Spectrum Density Replication

Dynamic data reconciliation to improve the result of controller performance assessment based on GMVC

Performance assessment of PID controller with time-variant disturbance dynamics

A Distributed Model Predictive Control Algorithm with the Gap Metric Output Feedback Decoupling

Improved 2-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control for PMSM

Enhancement of DDST-MFAC for tracking performance by using dynamic data reconciliation

Pseudo Feedforward Dynamic Matrix Control Algorithm for Desired Closed-Loop Performance in MPC Systems

Nonlinear Model Predictive Control for Doubly Fed Induction Generator with Uncertainties

Improved Three-Vector Based Dead-Beat Model Predictive Direct Power Control Strategy for Grid-Connected Inverters.

From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Development status of active disturbance rejection control

Reliability evaluation method for PID feedback control system considering performance degradation

Two-Degrees-of-Freedom PID Control with Kalman Filter for Engraving Machine System

Active disturbance rejection controller design for distributed parameter systems

Decentralized PID Controllers Tuning Based on Desired Dynamic Equations

On Tracking and Antidisturbance Ability of PID Controllers

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Based on Feedforward Inverse System for Turbofan Engines

A Controller Synthesis Method to Achieve Independent Reference Tracking Performance and Disturbance Rejection Performance

Simulation Analysis of PID Control System Based on Desired Dynamic Equation

An Improved Approach to Tuning MPC-PID Controller Parameters for Non-Gaussian Systems