Abstract:Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) can be summarized as follows: it inherits from proportional–integral–derivative (PID) the quality that makes it such a success: the error driven, rather than model-based, control law; it takes from modern control theory its best offering: the state observer; it embraces the power of nonlinear feedback and puts it to full use; it is a useful digital control technology developed out of an experimental platform rooted in computer simulations. ADRC is made possible only when control is taken as an experimental science, instead of a mathematical one. It is motivated by the ever increasing demands from industry that requires the control technology to move beyond PID, which has dominated the practice for over 80 years. Specifically, there are four areas of weakness in PID that we strive to address: 1) the error computation; 2) noise degradation in the derivative control; 3) oversimplification and the loss of performance in the control law in the form of a linear weighted sum; and 4) complications brought by the integral control. Correspondingly, we propose four distinct measures: 1) a simple differential equation as a transient trajectory generator; 2) a noise-tolerant tracking differentiator; 3) the nonlinear control laws; and 4) the concept and method of total disturbance estimation and rejection. Together, they form a new set of tools and a new way of control design. Times and again in experiments and on factory floors, ADRC proves to be a capable replacement of PID with unmistakable advantage in performance and practicality, providing solutions to pressing engineering problems of today. With the new outlook and possibilities that ADRC represents, we further believe that control engineering may very well break the hold of classical PID and enter a new era, an era that brings back the spirit of innovations.

Active Disturbance Rejection Control Based on Feedforward Inverse System for Turbofan Engines

Improved 2-Order Active Disturbance Rejection Control for PMSM

Dynamic Feed-Forward Control Aided with Active Disturbance Rejection for Boost Pressure and Mass Air Flow Control of Diesel Engines

Atmospheric Turbulence Rejection Control for a Geared Turbofan Engine

Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Diesel Engine Air System Based on Online Optimization of Observation Bandwidth and Control Gain

Active Disturbance Rejection Control on a bubbling fluidized bed

Shaft Speed Control of the Gas Turbine Based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Development status of active disturbance rejection control

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Control System Based on No Manual Tuned Active Disturbance Rejection Control

From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Model-based decoupling control of vgt and egr with active disturbance rejection in diesel engines

Robust Compensation for Active Disturbance Rejection Control of a Class of High‐order Systems with Large Time Delay: Simulation and Experimental Studies

A Novel Design Of Active Disturbance Rejection Controller And Its Application In The Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler Combustion System

Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Fluidized Bed Combustor

Decentralized Active Disturbance Rejection Control Design for the Gas Turbine

Active control of combustion oscillation with active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) method

On Tuning and Practical Implementation of Active Disturbance Rejection Controller: A Case Study from a Regenerative Heater in a 1000 MW Power Plant

A Practical Multivariable Control Approach Based on Inverted Decoupling and Decentralized Active Disturbance Rejection Control

Optimized active disturbance rejection controller design for circulating fluidized bed boiler combustion system

Frequency response-based decoupling tuning for feedforward compensation ADRC of distributed parameter systems

A Simulative Study on Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) as a Control Tool for Practitioners