Abstract:Introduction: Sutures or tacks are commonly used to secure a mesh in intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) hernia repair, but such penetrating fixations can cause local damage, that can be associated with pain. The use of an adhesive could be an alternative to reduce complications. However, a risk associated with this approach has been identified, particularly when the defect cannot be closed. A mesh glued to the peritoneum only might not provide as much mechanical reinforcement to the abdominal wall (AW) as a mesh anchored to the myofascial structure with penetrating fixations, which could lead to an increased recurrence rate. Additionally, the high elasticity of the peritoneum may increase mesh bulging. Leveraging an ex vivo approach, the objective of this study was to investigate the impact of mesh fixation using glue versus barbed sutures, on its biomechanical response for IPOM surgery. Methods: An experimental method was developed using ex vivo porcine abdominal wall samples (n = 12). A 4-cm centered circular defect was created by dissecting the skin and the subcutaneous tissue and removing muscle and extraperitoneal fat, while keeping the peritoneum intact. A 14-cm diameter mesh was secured (Dermabond™ cyanoacrylate adhesive or V-Loc™ barbed sutures) to the AW. The mesh was placed on the peritoneum to remain consistent with the IPOM placement. The sample was then subjected to some inflation tests to simulate increased levels of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) representing daily activities. For each test, mesh bulging into the defect was assessed as a function of the pressure using Digital Image Correlation (DIC) analysis. Results: Mesh bulging was studied for 2 configurations: suture fixation and glue. Glued meshes exhibited significantly higher bulging values than when sutured with a significant difference (p = 0.013) observed at 252 mmHg and a certain trend for statistical difference (p < 0.1) for stair climbing or coughing activities. Additionally, the stiffness of the repair was also significantly higher when the mesh was sutured compared to when it was glued to the peritoneum (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a mesh glued to the peritoneum exhibited higher bulging and a behavior of the repair less stiff compared to when it was sutured to the myofascial structure of the AW, particularly for high intra-abdominal pressures. However, the impact of these differences remains to be evaluated over time. Further preclinical investigations are needed to quantify their impact post-operatively.

The first experience with the Dextile anatomical mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing partially absorbable lightweight mesh and multifilament polyester anatomical mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

Endoscopic and histological evaluations of a newly designed inguinal hernia mesh implant: Experimental studies on porcine animal model and human cadaver

Tension free open inguinal hernia repair using an innovative self gripping semi-resorbable mesh

The preliminary experience in totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with three-dimensional mesh

Prospective randomized study comparing mesh displacement in enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation

Study of the biomechanical response of a prosthetic mesh secured with penetrating and non-penetrating fixations in IPOM ventral hernia repair

Comparison of slit mesh versus nonslit mesh in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair

Correction of Rectus Abdominis Diastasis: A Prospective Comparative Study Between a New Suturable Polypropylene Mesh vs Polypropylene Standard Suture Plication

Platelet-Rich Fibrin-Mesh Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair: Results of a Feasibility Pilot Study

HEDI: First-Time Clinical Application and Results of a Biomechanical Evaluation and Visualisation Tool for Incisional Hernia Repair

Duramesh registry study: short-term outcomes using mesh suture for abdominal wall closure

Biomechanical Influences on Mesh-Related Complications in Incisional Hernia Repair

A combined experimental and numerical approach to evaluate hernia mesh biomechanical stability in situ

Laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair versus open mesh repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Initial experience with the use of fibrin sealant for the fixation of the prosthetic mesh in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair

A Prospective Comparative Study of 3-Stitch Mesh Hernioplasty with Conventional Lichtenstein Repair

Comparing Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal and Lichtenstein Mesh Repair for Inguinal Hernias: A Focus on Patient Outcomes

The Preliminary Experience in Laparoscopic Abdominal Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair with Meshes

Promotion of Hernia Repair with High-Strength, Flexible, and Bioresorbable Silk Fibroin Mesh in a Large Abdominal Hernia Model

Are Surgeons Going to Be Left Holding the Bag? Incisional Hernia Repair and Intra-Peritoneal Non-Absorbable Mesh Implant Complications