Perioperative or adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX for resectable pancreatic cancer (PREOPANC-3): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

J. L. van Dam,E. M. M. Verkolf,E. N. Dekker,B. A. Bonsing,S. O. Bratlie,L. A. A. Brosens,O. R. Busch,L. M. J. W. van Driel,C. H. J. van Eijck,S. Feshtali,P. Ghorbani,D. J. A. de Groot,J. W. B. de Groot,B. C. M. Haberkorn,I. H. de Hingh,B. van der Holt,T. M. Karsten,M. B. van der Kolk,K. J. Labori,M. S. L. Liem,O. J. L. Loosveld,I. Q. Molenaar,M. B. Polée,H. C. van Santvoort,J. de Vos – Geelen,M. L. Wumkes,G. van Tienhoven,M. Y. V. Homs,M. G. Besselink,J. W. Wilmink,B. Groot Koerkamp
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11141-5
IF: 4.638
2023-08-08
BMC Cancer
Abstract:Surgical resection followed by adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) is currently the standard of care for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. The main concern regarding adjuvant chemotherapy is that only half of patients actually receive adjuvant treatment. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, on the other hand, guarantees early systemic treatment and may increase chemotherapy use and thereby improve overall survival. Furthermore, it may prevent futile surgery in patients with rapidly progressive disease. However, some argue that neoadjuvant therapy delays surgery, which could lead to progression towards unresectable disease and thus offset the potential benefits. Comparison of perioperative (i.e., neoadjuvant and adjuvant) with (only) adjuvant administration of mFOLFIRINOX in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is needed to determine the optimal approach.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?