Using oscillatory and aperiodic neural activity features for identifying idle state in SSVEP-based BCIs reduces false triggers

Rui Wang,Tianyi Zhou,Zheng Li,Jing Zhao,Xiaoli Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ad1054
IF: 5.043
2023-11-30
Journal of Neural Engineering
Abstract:Objective: In existing studies, rhythmic (oscillatory) components were used as main features to identify brain states, such as control and idle states, while non-rhythmic (aperiodic) components were ignored. Recent studies have shown that aperiodic (1/f) activity is functionally related to cognitive processes. It is not clear if aperiodic activity can distinguish brain states in asynchronous brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to reduce false triggers. In this paper, we propose an asynchronous method based on the fusion of oscillatory and aperiodic features for steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)-based BCIs. Methods: The proposed method first evaluates the oscillatory and aperiodic components of control and idle states using irregular-resampling auto-spectral analysis (IRASA). Oscillatory features are then extracted using the spectral power of the fundamental, second-harmonic, and third-harmonic frequencies of the oscillatory component, and aperiodic features are extracted using the slope and intercept of the first-order polynomial of the spectral fit of the aperiodic component under a log-logarithmic axis. The process produces two types of feature pools (oscillatory and aperiodic features). Next, feature selection (dimensionality reduction) is applied to the feature pools using Bonferroni-corrected p-values from a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Last, these spatial-specific statistically significant features are used as input for classification to identify the idle state. Results: On a 7-target dataset from 15 subjects, the mix of oscillatory and aperiodic features achieved an average accuracy of 88.39% compared to 83.53% when using oscillatory features alone (4.86% improvement). The results demonstrated that the proposed idle state recognition method achieved enhanced performance by incorporating aperiodic features. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that (1) aperiodic features were effective in recognizing idle states and (2) fusing features of oscillatory and aperiodic components enhanced classification performance by 4.86% compared to oscillatory features alone.
engineering, biomedical,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?