Abstract:Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP), an evoked brain potential, possesses the same frequency as periodic visual stimuli evoking potentials. It is extensively utilized in Brain-Computer Interface and human cognitive research. Moreover, the amplitude of SS VEP is sensitive to resources allocation of visual selective attention, and therefore can always serve as a corresponding electrophysiological indicator. In comparison with event-related potentials (ERPs) presented by P300 and N2pc, SS VEP index can be flexibly applied to a variety of paradigms and avoid errors caused by the brain lateralization as different items can be present in the center or in the same region of the view. Furthermore, SS VEP can reflect attention variation because of its continuity and sensibility to attention fluctuation. Besides, ERPs and SSVEP may reflect diverse attentive stages, and certain evidence suggests the attentive stage that SSVEP reflects is earlier compared with ERPs. Specifically, SSVEP may reflect the regulation that brain regions in charge of advanced cognitive function act on the visual cortex or the earlier stage of visual attention. Nevertheless, ERPs might reveal a later stage accomplished by brain regions responsible for higher-order cognitive processes such as the parietal lobe. In the study of visual selective attention, the frequency tagging is primarily employed to induce SSVEP. Visual stimuli are presented periodically at various frequencies to evoke SS VEP so that the stimuli are frequency tagged. We are able to figure out the allocation of attentive resources in those conditions by means of comparing SS VEP amplitude that the same stimulus evokes in a wide range of conditions. The frequency tagging is particularly appropriate to visual selective attention, especially feature-based and space-based attention. Benefiting from its accurate and sensitive reflection of attentive spatial distribution, SSVEP-based frequency tagging is widely adopted in space-based attention and directly proves the attention focus is shape-flexible and dividable but not always a solid circle. On the other hand, researchers developed the random dot kinematograms (RDK) paradigm for feature-based attention, which prolongs instantaneous feature-based attention process so that SS VEP can detect it. With RDK paradigm, researchers find strong evidence that feature-based attention does exist and has a global attentive activation. However, the other kind of visual selective attention, object-based attention. cannot be explored by frequency tagging because periodic flicker will be a highlighted feature so that participants will consider it as an object recognition marker and further destroy the integrity of the object. In the future, researchers can attempt to add emotion, reward and punishment. and working memory representations as research variables. or to build connections between feature-based attention and spatial-based attention in the process of using SS VEP to explore visual selective attention. In addition, the results of BC! algorithms for SS VEP have a potential for being a new visual selective attention index.

The Validity of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials as Attention Tags and Input Signals: A Critical Perspective of Frequency Allocation and Number of Stimuli

Steady-state Visual Evoked Potential and Its Applications in Studying Visual Selective Attention

Author Response for "single Stimulus Location for Two Inputs: A Combined Brain‐computer Interface Based on Steady State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP)"

High-Frequencycombination Coding-Based Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential For Brain Computer Interface

A Brain-Computer Interface Based on High-Frequency Steady-State Asymmetric Visual Evoked Potentials.

Research on High-Frequency Combination Coding-Based SSVEP-BCIs and Its Signal Processing Algorithms

Effects of Stimulus Frequency on Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces

Effects of Stimulus Spatial Resolution on SSVEP Responses under Overt and Covert Attention.

A comfortable steady state visual evoked potential stimulation paradigm using peripheral vision

A Comparison Study of Single- and Multiple-Target Stimulation Methods for Eliciting Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials.

Brain-computer Interface Based on the High-Frequency Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential

The Design Method of SSVEP Stimulus Source Based on Overlooking Map.

Optimizing user experience in SSVEP-BCI systems

Improving user experience of SSVEP BCI through low amplitude depth and high frequency stimuli design

[Recognition of High-Frequency Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential for Brain-Computer Interface].

Exploring steady-state visual evoked potentials as an index for intermodal and crossmodal spatial attention.

[Advances in brain-computer interface based on high-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential].

Effect of Competing Stimuli for Steady-State Visually Evoked Potential and Steady-State Motion Visually Evoked Potential

Frequency Set Selection for Multi-Frequency Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.

SSVEP detection assessment by combining visual stimuli paradigms and no-training detection methods

Relationship of SSVEP response between flash frequency conditions