Abstract:Model species (e.g., granivorous gamebirds, waterfowl, passerines, domesticated rodents) have been used for decades in guideline laboratory tests to generate survival, growth, and reproductive data for prospective ecological risk assessments (ERAs) for birds and mammals, while officially adopted risk assessment schemes for amphibians and reptiles do not exist. There are recognized shortcomings of current in vivo methods as well as uncertainty around the extent to which species with different life histories (e.g., terrestrial amphibians, reptiles, bats) than these commonly used models are protected by existing ERA frameworks. Approaches other than validating additional animal models for testing are being developed, but the incorporation of such new approach methodologies (NAMs) into risk assessment frameworks will require robust validations against in vivo responses. This takes time, and the ability to extrapolate findings from nonanimal studies to organism- and population-level effects in terrestrial wildlife remains weak. Failure to adequately anticipate and predict hazards could have economic and potentially even legal consequences for regulators and product registrants. In order to be able to use fewer animals or replace them altogether in the long term, vertebrate use and whole organism data will be needed to provide data for NAM validation in the short term. Therefore, it is worth investing resources for potential updates to existing standard test guidelines used in the laboratory as well as addressing the need for clear guidance on the conduct of field studies. Herein, we review the potential for improving standard in vivo test methods and for advancing the use of field studies in wildlife risk assessment, as these tools will be needed in the foreseeable future. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:699-724. © 2023 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC). Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Enhancing biodiversity in impact assessments: practical guidance is needed to support holistic environmental decision-making

Using strategic environmental assessment and project environmental impact assessment to assess ecological connectivity at multiple scales in a national park context

Running to stand still: The application of substandard OECMs in national and provincial policy in Canada

Toxicological effects assessment for wildlife in the 21st century: Review of current methods and recommendations for a path forward

The inclusion of biodiversity into Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) framework: A strategic integration of ecocentric extinction accounting

The path to scientifically sound biodiversity valuation in the context of the Global Biodiversity Framework

Corporate disclosures need a biodiversity outcome focus and regulatory backing to deliver global conservation goals

Evaluating Biodiversity Credits Using Metacommunity Modelling

Measuring the Impact of Conservation: The Growing Importance of Monitoring Fauna, Flora and Funga

Improving collaboration in the implementation of global biodiversity conventions

Four challenges to an effective national nature assessment

Rapid evaluation of habitat connectivity change to safeguard multispecies persistence in human-transformed landscapes

Impacts and mechanisms of biological invasions in global protected areas

Challenges and lessons of implementing strategic environmental assessment in a critically endangered ecosystem

Investing in the wealth of nature through biodiversity and ecosystem service finance solutions

Discussion on the Mechanism of Integrating Biodiversity into Environmental Impact Assessment

An Urgent Call to Integrate the Health Sector into the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework

Understanding and achieving species elements in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework

Assessing coverage of the Monitoring Framework of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and opportunities to fill gaps.

Biodiversity Impact Assessment Considering Land Use Intensities and Fragmentation

Policies and socioenvironmental dynamics for ecosystem management