Philine Guckelberger,Benjamin R. Doughty,Glen Munson,Suhas S.P. Rao,Yingxuan Tan,Xiangmeng Shawn Cai,Charles P. Fulco,Joseph Nasser,Kristy S. Mualim,Drew T. Bergman,Judhajeet Ray,Evelyn Jagoda,Chad J. Munger,Andreas R. Gschwind,Maya U. Sheth,Anthony S. Tan,Saul Godinez Pulido,Namita Mitra,David Weisz,Muhammad Saad Shamim,Neva C. Durand,Ragini Mahajan,Ruqayya Khan,Lars M. Steinmetz,Masato T. Kanemaki,Eric S. Lander,Alexander Meissner,Erez Lieberman Aiden,Jesse M. Engreitz

Abstract:Enhancers are key drivers of gene regulation thought to act via 3D physical interactions with the promoters of their target genes. However, genome-wide depletions of architectural proteins such as cohesin result in only limited changes in gene expression, despite a loss of contact domains and loops. Consequently, the role of cohesin and 3D contacts in enhancer function remains debated. Here, we developed CRISPRi of regulatory elements upon degron operation (CRUDO), a novel approach to measure how changes in contact frequency impact enhancer effects on target genes by perturbing enhancers with CRISPRi and measuring gene expression in the presence or absence of cohesin. We systematically perturbed all 1,039 candidate enhancers near five cohesin-dependent genes and identified 34 enhancer-gene regulatory interactions. Of 26 regulatory interactions with sufficient statistical power to evaluate cohesin dependence, 18 show cohesin-dependent effects. A decrease in enhancer-promoter contact frequency upon removal of cohesin is frequently accompanied by a decrease in the regulatory effect of the enhancer on gene expression, consistent with a contact-based model for enhancer function. However, changes in contact frequency and regulatory effects on gene expression vary as a function of distance, with distal enhancers (e.g., >50Kb) experiencing much larger changes than proximal ones (e.g., <50Kb). Because most enhancers are located close to their target genes, these observations can explain how only a small subset of genes — those with strong distal enhancers — are sensitive to cohesin. Together, our results illuminate how 3D contacts, influenced by both cohesin and genomic distance, tune enhancer effects on gene expression.

The Mediator complex regulates enhancer-promoter interactions

The Mediator Complex: A Central Coordinator of Plant Adaptive Responses to Environmental Stresses

The Mediator complex as a master regulator of transcription by RNA polymerase II

The Mediator complex: a central integrator of transcription

Histone H3 Lysine 4 Monomethylation Modulates Long-Range Chromatin Interactions at Enhancers

The Mediator Complex: a Master Coordinator of Transcription and Cell Lineage Development.

Structural basis of the human transcriptional Mediator complex modulated by its dissociable Kinase module

Mediator Complexes in Gene Transcription

Structural basis of the human transcriptional Mediator regulated by its dissociable kinase module

Cohesin-mediated 3D contacts tune enhancer-promoter regulation

Mediator Complex——Central Controller of Eukaryotic Transcription

Promoter-proximal CTCF binding promotes distal enhancer-dependent gene activation

Mediator structural conservation and implications for the regulation mechanism.

Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates

Mediator Structure and Interaction with the Basal Transcription Machinery

Mediator structure and conformation change

CTCF Promotes Long-range Enhancer-promoter Interactions and Lineage-specific Gene Expression in Mammalian Cells

Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control

The Pol II preinitiation complex (PIC) influences Mediator binding but not promoter–enhancer looping

Mediator Med23 Regulates Basal Transcription In Vivo Via An Interaction With P-Tefb

Interaction of the mediator head module with RNA polymerase II.