Cohesin-mediated 3D contacts tune enhancer-promoter regulation

Philine Guckelberger,Benjamin R. Doughty,Glen Munson,Suhas S.P. Rao,Yingxuan Tan,Xiangmeng Shawn Cai,Charles P. Fulco,Joseph Nasser,Kristy S. Mualim,Drew T. Bergman,Judhajeet Ray,Evelyn Jagoda,Chad J. Munger,Andreas R. Gschwind,Maya U. Sheth,Anthony S. Tan,Saul Godinez Pulido,Namita Mitra,David Weisz,Muhammad Saad Shamim,Neva C. Durand,Ragini Mahajan,Ruqayya Khan,Lars M. Steinmetz,Masato T. Kanemaki,Eric S. Lander,Alexander Meissner,Erez Lieberman Aiden,Jesse M. Engreitz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.12.603288
2024-07-22
Abstract:Enhancers are key drivers of gene regulation thought to act via 3D physical interactions with the promoters of their target genes. However, genome-wide depletions of architectural proteins such as cohesin result in only limited changes in gene expression, despite a loss of contact domains and loops. Consequently, the role of cohesin and 3D contacts in enhancer function remains debated. Here, we developed CRISPRi of regulatory elements upon degron operation (CRUDO), a novel approach to measure how changes in contact frequency impact enhancer effects on target genes by perturbing enhancers with CRISPRi and measuring gene expression in the presence or absence of cohesin. We systematically perturbed all 1,039 candidate enhancers near five cohesin-dependent genes and identified 34 enhancer-gene regulatory interactions. Of 26 regulatory interactions with sufficient statistical power to evaluate cohesin dependence, 18 show cohesin-dependent effects. A decrease in enhancer-promoter contact frequency upon removal of cohesin is frequently accompanied by a decrease in the regulatory effect of the enhancer on gene expression, consistent with a contact-based model for enhancer function. However, changes in contact frequency and regulatory effects on gene expression vary as a function of distance, with distal enhancers (e.g., >50Kb) experiencing much larger changes than proximal ones (e.g., <50Kb). Because most enhancers are located close to their target genes, these observations can explain how only a small subset of genes — those with strong distal enhancers — are sensitive to cohesin. Together, our results illuminate how 3D contacts, influenced by both cohesin and genomic distance, tune enhancer effects on gene expression.
Molecular Biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: What is the specific role of Cohesin - mediated three - dimensional contacts in enhancer - promoter regulation? ### Background In the mammalian genome, spatio - temporal - specific gene expression is mainly driven by enhancers. At present, the mainstream view is that enhancers regulate gene expression by forming three - dimensional physical contacts with the promoters of target genes, namely the "loop model". However, when structural proteins such as Cohesin are knocked out at the whole - genome level, although the contact domains and loop structures are lost, the changes in gene expression are very limited. This has led to a controversy about the role of Cohesin and three - dimensional contacts in enhancer function. ### Research Objectives In order to explore how Cohesin - mediated three - dimensional contacts affect the function of enhancers, the authors developed a new method - CRISPRi of Regulatory Elements Upon Degron Operation (CRUDO) to measure the changes in the influence of enhancers on the expression of target genes in the presence and absence of Cohesin. Through this method, researchers systematically interfered with 1039 candidate enhancers near five Cohesin - dependent genes and evaluated the regulatory effects of these enhancers in the presence and absence of Cohesin. ### Main Findings 1. **Quantitative changes in enhancer - promoter contact frequency regulate the influence of enhancers on gene expression**: When Cohesin is removed, the contact frequency between enhancers and promoters generally decreases, especially the contact frequency of distal enhancers (> 50Kb) decreases significantly, while the change in the contact frequency of proximal enhancers (< 50Kb) is relatively small. 2. **Distal enhancers are more dependent on Cohesin**: Among 26 regulatory interactions with sufficient statistical power, 18 showed Cohesin - dependent effects. After the removal of Cohesin, the regulatory effect of distal enhancers on gene expression is significantly weakened. 3. **Most genes are not affected by Cohesin**: Since most enhancers are located near their target genes, only a few genes with strong distal enhancers are sensitive to the removal of Cohesin. ### Conclusions These results reveal how three - dimensional contacts regulate the influence of enhancers on gene expression under the influence of Cohesin and genomic distance. Distal enhancers are more dependent on Cohesin, while proximal enhancers are relatively independent. This finding explains why the removal of Cohesin only affects the expression of a small number of genes and also clarifies how the three - dimensional structure of the genome finely regulates gene expression.