Response and re-treatment response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in advanced cervical cancer: A follow up study.

Jennifer Wolf,Yiqing Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.e17516
IF: 45.3
2023-06-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e17516 Background: Single agent checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (CII) was approved in June 2018 for second line treatment for metastatic cervical cancer after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Clinical trials recommended 2 years of treatment, however the optimal duration of treatment, outcome after stopping treatment and response after re-initiation of immunotherapy is still largely unclear. Methods: A cohort of 10 patients who were started on CII before September 31, 2019, with an initial analysis published in July 2021 were eligible. We performed an updated review of the duration of response, outcome off treatment after 2 years, and outcome after re-initiation of CII. Results: The current median follow up is 40 months (range, 2.0-50.8 months), 4 patients did not respond to treatment and have passed away, while six patients remain alive. The previous report showed 7 responders, with 3 complete responses (CR) at a median follow up of 20.7 m. With prolonged treatment, 6 patients achieved CR or stable minimal disease. After more than 2 years of treatment, 2 continued treatment for 39m and 50 m. Among the 4 patients who stopped treatment, 2 of them are 18 m and 20 m off treatment and remain no evidence of disease. Another 2 patients developed asymptomatic recurrence detected on surveillance CT (at 9 m and 12 m respectively), both with small volume of disease in the retroperitoneal and pelvic lymph nodes. They were both re-initiated on CII, and showed a CR and partial response (PR) respectively, on 3-6 month follow up CT scans, now 11.7 m and 3.5 m on treatment. A median PD-L1 combined expression score (CPS) was similar between responders (n=6) (20) and non-responders (26) (n=4) in the entire cohort overall, and was 83 in the group of patients who discontinued treatment after 2 years and have been without evidence of disease since (n=2). Conclusions: Patients who respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors may have durable response off treatment and may respond again to re-treatment in the event of recurrent disease. Our limited data suggest that providers can use CPS to aid in decision making. [Table: see text]
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?