Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in non‐small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Yu Feng,Yunxia Tao,Haizhu Chen,Yu Zhou,Le Tang,Chenwei Liu,Xingsheng Hu,Yuankai Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15063
IF: 3.223
2023-08-10
Thoracic Cancer
Abstract:This meta‐analysis enrolled 17 studies, covering 2,100 patients with non small cell lung cancer who were treated with two lines (the initial line was 1L‐, the subquent line was 2L‐) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). It was found that the tumor efficacy of 2L‐ICIs was limited, but for pre‐screened patients in whom the 1L‐ICIs were discontinued following clinical decision and in whom the 1L‐progression free survival (PFS) longer than 2‐years, both showing significantly prolonged median PFS of 2L‐ICIs compared with other subgroups. Background The aim of the study was to explore the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Studies that enrolled NSCLC patients treated with two lines of ICIs were included using four databases. The initial line (1L‐) and subsequent lines (2L‐) of ICIs were defined as 1L‐ICI and 2L‐ICI, respectively. Results A total of 17 studies involving 2100 patients were included. The pooled objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression‐free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) for 2L‐ICIs were 10%, 50%, 3.0 months, and 13.1 months, respectively. The 2L‐ICI discontinuation rates caused by toxicities ranged from 0% to 23.5%. Original data were extracted from six studies, covering 89 patients. Patients in whom 1L‐ICIs were discontinued following clinical decision (the mPFS of 2L‐ICIs was not reach) achieved a more prolonged mPFS of 2L‐ICIs than those due to toxicity (5.2 months) and progressive disease (2.1 months) (p
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?