Abstract:In near-surface investigations, the advent of massive seismic data has ushered in the application of deep learning (DL) techniques for surface wave inversion to attain the shear-wave velocity (Vs). While the efficiency of DL inversion surpasses that of classic physics-driven methods, its broader attributes remain underexplored. Our study delves into a comparative analysis of DL inversion versus physics-driven inversion, focusing on three key aspects: anti-noise ability, stability, and generalization.In numerical experiments, we employ the neighborhood algorithm (NA) (Wathelet, 2008) as a representative of physics-driven inversion, and a convolutional neural network (CNN) constructed for near-surface investigations (Chen et al., 2022) as a representative of data-driven inversion. In addition to comparing the two methods, we also explore the characteristics of joint inversion using Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves (DCs) and Love-wave DCs in the three above aspects. To quantitatively evaluate inversion results, we calculate the root mean square error and relative error of both DCs and Vs. The assessment of anti-noise performance involves applying NA and CNN to DCs with varying noise levels. To gauge stability, we introduce errors in compressional-wave velocity (Vp) and density, examining their effects on inversion precision. Lastly, to assess generalization, we use NA and CNN to invert DCs whose Vs exceeds the range of the training dataset by different percentages.Our findings reveal that DL inversion has a higher anti-noise ability compared with NA. Both methods demonstrate high stability, with errors in Vp and density exerting a slight impact on inversion results, aligning with surface wave inversion characteristics. Compared with physics-driven inversion, generalization is a unique feature of data-driven inversion. The experimental results indicate that the CNN can predict Vs models that are not included in the training dataset although this ability is somewhat limited. Furthermore, like physics-driven inversion, joint inversion enhances all three examined aspects for data-driven inversion. This analysis of characteristics can guide the selection of inversion methods for surface wave applications in near-surface investigations. References:Wathelet M., "An improved neighborhood algorithm: parameter conditions and dynamic scaling," Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 2008, doi: 10.1029/2008GL033256. Chen X., Xia J., Pang J., Zhou C., and Mi B., "Deep learning inversion of Rayleigh-wave dispersion curves with geological constraints for near-surface investigations," Geophysical Journal International, vol. 231, no. 1, pp. 1-14, 2022, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggac171.

Physics-guided deep-learning inversion method for the interpretation of noisy logging-while-drilling resistivity measurements

Physics-Informed Deep Learning Inversion with Application to Noisy Magnetotelluric Measurements

Physics-Driven Deep Learning Inversion for Direct Current Resistivity Survey Data

A Deep Learning Approach to the Inversion of Borehole Resistivity Measurements

3-D Magnetotelluric Deep Learning Inversion Guided by Pseudo-Physical Information

Tunnel resistivity deep learning inversion method based on physics‐driven and signal interpretability

Improving Deep Groundwater Aquifer Characterization with Deep Learning Inversion of Audio-Frequency Magnetotelluric Data

Robust deep learning seismic inversion with a priori initial model constraint

Deep learning-based airborne transient electromagnetic inversion providing the depth of investigation

Deep-Learning-Based Amplitude Variation with Angle Inversion with Multi-Input Neural Networks

Comparison of Data-Driven and Physics-Driven Surface Wave Inversion

Inversion of DC Resistivity Data using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Deep Learning Joint Inversion of Electrical Data for Ahead-Prospecting in Tunneling

Deep Learning Inversion of Rayleigh-wave Dispersion Curves with Geological Constraints for Near-Surface Investigations

Fast hierarchical inversion for borehole resistivity measurements in high-angle and horizontal wells using ADNN-AMLM

Deep Learning to Estimate Permeability using Geophysical Data

Deep-learning seismic full-waveform inversion for realistic structural models

Deep learning for high-resolution multichannel seismic impedance inversion

3D cooperative inversion of airborne magnetic and gravity gradient data using deep learning techniques

Integrating Deep Learning and Deterministic Inversion for Enhancing Fault Detection in Electrical Resistivity Surveys

An Intelligent Inversion Method for Azimuth Electromagnetic Logging While Drilling Measurements