Abstract:: For a long time, China’s grassroots mass self-governance organizations, represented by urban community residents’ committees and rural villagers’ committees, as the important main body of social governance activities, have to a certain extent deviated from their functional “self-governance” function due to the “administrative” tendency in their institutional inertia. As modern social governance attaches greater importance to multi-factor participation and multi-dimensional cooperation in governance activities, the concept of governance that synergizes “self-governance and shared governance” has been given high priority in the governance of China's urban and rural communities, and has become a key element in the “common building, common governance and shared sharing” social governance system and governance system of the times, which is highly characteristic of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The concept of “self-governance and shared governance” has been highly valued in the governance of urban and rural communities in China, and has been embodied in the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity, which is very characteristic of the socialist era with Chinese characteristics. In this process, the Party’s leadership has been consistently applied throughout the entire process and in all aspects of grassroots governance; the political function of community Party organizations has been continuously strengthened; the leading role of grassroots Party organizations and the pioneering and exemplary role of Party members have been fully brought into play, leading to the high-quality development of community governance; democratic self-governance of the grassroots in the community has been effectively promoted, and grass-roots practice of people’s democracy in the entire process has been perfected; importance has been attached to fostering the professional qualities of community workers, and to upgrading the professional qualities of community leaders represented by neighborhood and village committees. The way to develop and improve China’s practice of community governance in the new era is paying attention to fostering the professional qualifications of community workers and improving the self-governance capacity of grass-roots mass self-governance organizations represented by neighborhood committees and village committees.

Coordinated Co-governance and Grassroots Innovation: A Case Study of Shenzhen’s Livelihood-Related Project Voting System

From Manipulation to Integration: the Strategic Transformation of Grassroots Control in China

Community Renewal under Multi-Stakeholder Co-Governance: A Case Study of Shanghai's Inner City

Research on Innovative Paths of Grassroots Social Governance in China Based on Collaborative Governance Theory: A Case Study of N City in China

Led by the Party Building: The Construction of Urban and Rural Community Governance System Under the Concept of Self-governance and Co-governance

Decentralization in a centralized system: Project-based governance for land-related public goods provision in China

Innovation of Contemporary Chinese Urban Community Governance under the Perspective of Social Capital: Participation of Multiple Subjects Based on Community Proposals

Village Elections, Grassroots Governance and the Restructuring of State Power: An Empirical Study in Southern Peri-urban China

Democratic Localism: the Case of Grassroots Self-Governance in Urban China

Civil society organizations in China: Navigating the local government for more inclusive environmental governance

The Direct Election of the Urban Residents Committee and the Urban Grassroots Governance

Community Governance Reform in Urban China: A Case Study of the Yantian Model in Shenzhen

A New Top-Down Governance Approach to Community Gardens: A Case Study of the “We Garden” Community Experiment in Shenzhen, China

Exploring Innovative Structures and Mechanisms in Urban Grassroots Governance: A Network Governance Perspective

“Paired Competition”: A New Mechanism for the Innovation of Urban Grassroots Governance

Make Democracy Work in the Cultivation of Innovation Systematic Field: Take Hangzhou's Governance as an Example

Innovation of Grassroots Governance in China:Investigation and Comparison in Macro Framework

Managed social innovation: The case of government-sponsored venture philanthropy in Shanghai

The Sustainability of the Project-Driven Innovation of Grassroots Governance: Influencing Factors and Combination Paths

Empowered Autonomy: The Politics of Community Governance Innovations in Shanghai, China

How Does Technology Empowerment Activate the “Collaborative Inertia” of Grassroots Governance- Systematic Study Based on the Case of “Black Tea Council” in the H Street, Hangzhou