Co-mutational status and PD-L1 expression in KRAS mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Role in treatment selection and association with clinical outcomes.

Hina Khan,Julia Judd,Joanne Xiu,Asad Ullah,Girindra Ghanshyam Raval,Patrick C. Ma,Jorge J. Nieva,Milan Radovich,Matthew James Oberley,So Yeon Kim,Hirva Mamdani,Luis E. Raez,Ari M. Vanderwalde,Balasz Halmos,Hossein Borghaei,Stephen V. Liu,Nagla Fawzy Abdel Karim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.9038
IF: 45.3
2023-06-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:9038 Background: In NSCLC, different KRAS mutations (mt) define unique subgroups and certain co-mutations (co-mt) could have prognostic and therapeutic implications. Retrospective studies associate poor prognosis with co-mts in STK11 and KEAP1 with KRAS. It is unclear if PD-L1 expression and co-mt in KRAS mt NSCLC impacts outcomes. Methods: Molecular profiles of 27748 NSCLC tumors were tested with next-generation sequencing (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ) and classified by KRAS mt. PD-L1 IHC (22C3) was reported as TPS. Real-world post-immunotherapy (IO) overall survival (OS) was obtained from insurance claims and calculated from start of an immune check-point inhibitor (with or without chemotherapy) to the last day of follow-up. Results: In all, 7634 (28%) samples had a KRAS mt; most common being G12C (11%), G12V (5.3%), G12D (3.9%) and G13X (2.0%). The most frequent co-mt was KRAS-TP53 (KP) (46%), similar in all KRAS subtypes. KRAS-STK11(KL) was in 23% of KRAS mt, enriched in G13X (33%) and lowest in G12D (16%). KRAS-KEAP1(KK) was co-mt in 10% of KRAS mt, highest in G13X (16%) and lowest in G12D (8%). KRASmt/ STK11wt/ KEAP1wt/ TP53wt (K only) was 27% of KRAS mt, highest in G12D (36%) and lowest in G13X (16%). A small subgroup, 5.6% was KRAS-STK11-KEAP1 co-mt (KKL). The majority of pts in the KL (61%), KK (52%) and KKL (62%) cohorts had TPS <1%. In 1723 KRAS mt NSCLC pts treated with IO, KL, KK and KKL had significantly worse post-IO OS than KP and K only (table); KKL had the lowest OS. In the TPS≥1% KRAS mt group, KL, KK and KKL had worse post-IO OS than KP and K-only. In TPS<1% group, KL and KK had poor post-IO OS and K-only had favorable outcomes. However, KP had worse post-IO OS compared to K-only in TPS<1%. In G12C and G12V, similar trend with worse post-IO OS in KL, KK and KKL, compared to KP and K only was noted. Conclusions: We report a large real-world dataset evaluating outcomes with check-point inhibitors in NSCLCs with KRAS and specific co-mts. KL, KK and KKL subgroups demonstrate universally poor outcomes in all KRAS subtypes irrespective of PD-L1. Pts with KP co-mts have adverse post-IO outcomes in TPS<1% but favorable in TPS≥1%. TPS score remains a predictive marker of IO outcomes in KP, but not in KL, KK and KKL. These observations emphasize that both PD-L1 and co-mts have a clear association with clinical outcomes in KRAS-mt NSCLC, and must be used in predictive models for individualized therapy. [Table: see text]
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?