Real world outcomes in KRAS G12C mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer

Wanyuan Cui,Fanny Franchini,Marliese Alexander,Ann Officer,Hui-Li Wong,Maarten IJzerman,Jayesh Desai,Benjamin J Solomon,Benjamin J. Solomon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.06.030
IF: 6.081
2020-08-01
Lung Cancer
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background</h3><p><em>KRAS</em> mutations are found in 20-30% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and were traditionally considered undruggable. <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> mutation confers sensitivity to <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> covalent inhibitors, however its prognostic impact remains unclear. This study assesses the frequency, clinical features, prevalence of brain metastases and outcomes in <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> NSCLC in a real-world setting.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Patients enrolled in the prospective Thoracic Malignancies Cohort (TMC) between July 2012 to October 2019 with recurrent/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC, available <em>KRAS</em> results, and without <em>EGFR/ALK/ROS1</em> gene aberrations, were selected. Data was extracted from TMC and patient records. Clinicopathologic features, treatment and overall survival (OS) was compared for <em>KRAS</em> wildtype (<em>KRAS</em><sup>WT</sup>) and <em>KRAS</em> mutated (<em>KRAS</em><sup>mut</sup>); and <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> and other (<em>KRAS</em><sup>other</sup>) mutations.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Of 1386 NSCLC patients, 1040 were excluded: non-metastatic/recurrent (526); unknown <em>KRAS</em> status (356); <em>ALK/EGFR/ROS1</em> positive (154); duplicate (4). Of 346 patients analysed, 144 (42%) were <em>KRAS</em><sup>mut</sup>, of whom 65 (45%) were <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup>. All patients with <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> were active or ex-smokers, compared to 92% of <em>KRAS</em><sup>other</sup> and 83% of <em>KRAS</em><sup>WT</sup>. The prevalence of brain metastases during follow-up was similar between <em>KRAS</em><sup>mut</sup> and <em>KRAS</em><sup>WT</sup> (33% vs 40%, p = 0.17), and <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> and <em>KRAS</em><sup>other</sup> (40% vs 41%, p = 0.74). The proportion of patients receiving one or multiple lines of systemic therapy was comparable. OS was similar between <em>KRAS</em><sup>mut</sup> and <em>KRAS</em><sup>WT</sup> (p = 0.54), and <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> and <em>KRAS</em><sup>other</sup> (p = 0.39).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with <em>KRAS</em><sup>mut</sup> and <em>KRAS</em><sup>WT</sup>, and <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> and <em>KRAS</em><sup>other</sup> NSCLC have comparable clinical features, treatment and survival. While not prognostic, <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> may be an important predictive biomarker as promising <em>KRAS</em><sup>G12C</sup> covalent inhibitors continue to be developed.</p>
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?