Effect of Various Acid Solutions as an Aid in Removing the OrthoMTA-Based Root Canal Filling

Naveen Chhabra,Abhishek Parolia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134535

IF: 3.4

2023-06-23

Materials

Abstract:The objectives of this study were to compare the effects of various acid solutions combined with ultrasonics as an aid to remove mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-based root canal filling and to assess their effect on the surface topography and microhardness of root canal dentin. Materials and Method: Fifty human permanent single rooted and single canaled freshly extracted teeth were decoronated and sectioned apically to prepare the middle third of root sections of 5 mm length. The canals were prepared in a step-back manner. OrthoMTA was packed throughout the prepared canals. These root sections were incubated for one week and subsequently randomly allocated to five groups (n = 10) according to the OrthoMTA removal method: No treatment (NT); 5% glycolic acid + ultrasonics (5% GA+U); 10% glycolic acid + ultrasonics (10% GA+U); 10% citric acid + ultrasonics (10% CA+U); Distilled water + ultrasonics (DW+U). A 1 mm deep well was created within the coronal end of the set OrthoMTA. Wells were filled with each respective test solution and left for 5 min. Thereafter, further removal of OrthoMTA used a specific ultrasonic tip. Finally, the canals were flushed using 1 mL of the respective test solutions and activated with a Controlled Memory ultrasonic tip for two cycles of 20 s each followed by flushing with 1 mL of distilled water and paper point drying of the canals. Then, specimens were longitudinally split into two halves and examined under a scanning electron microscope (1000×) to assess the residual OrthoMTA and surface topography of root canal dentin. The Vickers surface microhardness of treated radicular dentin was measured using the HMV-2 microhardness tester. Result: Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. Significant differences for residual OrthoMTA were observed between (10% GA+U) with (5% GA+U), (10% CA+U), (DW+U) and (NT) (p value < 0.01). In the context of microhardness, (5% GA+U) and (10% GA+U) showed statistically significant difference compared to (NT), (10% CA+U) and (DW+U) (p value < 0.01). Conclusion: 10% GA+U was superior to other tested groups in removing OrthoMTA, but it substantially reduced dentin microhardness.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to effectively remove the root canal filling material based on OrthoMTA during root canal retreatment, and to evaluate the effects of different acid solutions combined with ultrasonic technology on the surface morphology and micro - hardness of root canal dentin. Specifically, the study aims to compare the effects of several different acid solutions (5% glycolic acid, 10% glycolic acid, 10% citric acid and distilled water) combined with ultrasonic technology in removing OrthoMTA, as well as the specific effects of these methods on the surface morphology and micro - hardness of root canal dentin.

### Research Background
OrthoMTA is a new type of root canal filling material with good biocompatibility and low heavy metal content. It forms a layer of hydroxyapatite (HAp) in the root canal, which helps to prevent micro - leakage and promote the regeneration of periapical tissues. However, when root canal treatment fails and retreatment is required, complete removal of the old filling material is a challenge. Residual filling material may hinder the contact of disinfectants and drugs and hide persistent microorganisms, thus affecting the long - term prognosis of retreatment.

### Research Objectives
1. **Compare the effects of different acid solutions combined with ultrasonic technology**: Evaluate the effects of 5% glycolic acid, 10% glycolic acid, 10% citric acid and distilled water combined with ultrasonic technology in removing OrthoMTA.
2. **Evaluate the effects on the surface morphology and micro - hardness of root canal dentin**: Observe the surface morphology of root canal dentin by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and measure the micro - hardness of dentin using a Vickers hardness tester.

### Main Findings
- **Removal effect**: 10% glycolic acid combined with ultrasonic technology (10% GA + U) is the most effective in removing OrthoMTA, followed by 5% glycolic acid combined with ultrasonic technology (5% GA + U), 10% citric acid combined with ultrasonic technology (10% CA + U) and distilled water combined with ultrasonic technology (DW + U). The removal effect of the untreated group (NT) is the worst.
- **Surface morphology**: The dentin surface in the 10% GA + U group is the cleanest, with open dentinal tubules and a small amount of residual OrthoMTA particles visible. The dentin surfaces in other groups are covered with residual OrthoMTA to varying degrees.
- **Micro - hardness**: The micro - hardness of dentin in the 5% GA + U and 10% GA + U groups is significantly reduced, while the micro - hardness changes in the 10% CA + U and DW + U groups are not obvious.

### Conclusion
10% glycolic acid combined with ultrasonic technology is the most effective in removing OrthoMTA, but it will significantly reduce the micro - hardness of dentin. Therefore, the relationship between removal effect and dentin protection needs to be balanced in clinical application.