Abstract:Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui ada atau tidaknya perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode quasi experimental research dengan desain penelitian posttest only with nonequivalent group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri A Karanganyar Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah cluster random sampling. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah kelas XI IPA 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dan kelas XI IPA 2 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2 dengan model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik tes dan teknik non tes. Uji hipotesis yang digunakan adalah uji t. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata argumentasi ilmiah tertulis kelas eksperimen 2 lebih tinggi yaitu 74,44 dibandingkan dengan kelas eksperimen 1 yaitu 65,99. Hasil uji t menunjukkan bahwa thitung>ttabel (4,675>1,99444), artinya terdapat perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa yang signifikan antara kelas eksperimen 1 dan kelas eksperimen 2. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah bahwa ada perbedaan kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah tertulis siswa melalui model pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Inkuiri Terbimbing dipadu Dialog Socrates. Students' argumentation skills: A comparison between the guided-inquiry learning model and the Socrates dialogue-integrated guided-inquiry learning model AbstractThe research aimed to determine whether there was a difference in students’ written scientific argumentation skills through Guided Inquiry learning model and Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socratic Dialogue. The research was quasi-experimental research. The research design used was posttest only with nonequivalent group design. The population in this research were all students of class XI IPA of SMA Negeri A Karanganyar academic year 2018/2019. The sampling technique used in this research was cluster random sampling. The sample in this study was class XI IPA 1 as the experimental class 1 with the Guided Inquiry learning model and class XI IPA 2 as the experimental class 2 with the Guided Inquiry learning model combined with Socrates Dialogue. The data collection technique used was test technique and non-test technique. The hypothesis test used was t-test. The results of the research showed that the average scientific written argument for the experimental class 2 was higher at 74.44 compared to the experimental class 1 at 65.99. The t-test results show that tcount>ttable (4,675> 1,99444), meaning that there were significant differences in students' written scientific argumentation skills between the experimental class 1 and the experimental class 2. The conclusion of this study was that there was a difference in students' written scientific argumentation skills through the Guided Inquiry learning model with Guided Inquiry learning model integrated with Socrates Dialogue.

Using the Rasch Model to Measure Students' Argumentative Ability in the Context of Socioscientific Issues About the Covid-19 Pandemic

Profile of Junior High School Students’ Scientific Literacy

Analysis of Internet Uses by High School Students Based on Digital Literacy

Digital Literacy Competence Levels of Indonesian Junior High School Students Based on Activities Through The 5m Approach

Students’ scientific reasoning and argumentative abilities through levels of inquiry models based on socio-scientific issue

Problem Solving: A Learning Model to Foster Argumentation and Critical Thinking Ability for Students with Different Academic Abilities

The Effectiveness of Socio-scientific Issues-Based Learning and Digital Literacy to Build Critical Thinking Skills for Students of Senior High School

The Process of Developing Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skill Using Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model in Senior High School on The Topic of Elasticity

Major domain of socioscientific decision making: Preliminary questionnaire development

Development of Teaching Material Supplements Based on Socio Scientific Issues to Improve Students' Scientific Argumentation Ability

The Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Model on Students' Argumentation Ability on Salt Hydrolysis Material

Analysis of Junior High School students’ critical thinking ability on ecosystem materials

Rasch Validation of Instrument Measuring Gen-Z Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Application in Teaching during the Pandemic

The Effectiveness of Science E-Magazine of Socioscientific Issues-Based Inquiry Model to Improve Critical Thinking Skill of Junior High School Students

Kemampuan argumentasi siswa: Perbandingan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing dan inkuiri terbimbing dipadu dialog Socrates

Growing Prosocial Behavior through the Simple Social Based Problem Model Post the COVID-19 Pandemic

Critical Thinking Profile of Senior High School Students in terms of Argumentation-Based Learning

THE CHALLENGES OF SCIENCE TEACHERS IN IMPROVING STUDENTS’ RATIONAL THINKING ABILITIES THROUGH SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUE BASED LEARNING

Development and validation of the inquiry-based nature of science and argumentation: A new instructional model on students’ scientific argumentation ability

Enhancing Students' Scientific Argumentation Skills in Salt Hydrolysis Materials With The Application of The POE (Predict-Observe-Explain) Learning Model

Reasoning Model and Moral Simulation to Improve Students’ Social Skills: A Focused Look at Emotional Intelligence