Abstract:The process of decision‐making is a multifaceted cognitive endeavor encompassing various cognitive, emotional, psychological, and social processes. It empowers individuals to select from a range of alternatives. Its significance spans across age groups, impacting both adults and children, and the relevance of which goes beyond aiding learners in choosing their educational or professional paths; it also pertains to preparing them to navigate the diverse situations they will encounter throughout their lives. To approach this ability, we developed a scale comprising 20 items, assessing five distinct decision‐making factors. This scale was administered to a sample of 303 learners in the first and second years of the baccalaureate course (pre‐final and final years of secondary education), representing both genders, and studying in four high schools. The participants' ages ranged between 16 and 20 years. The results of this study revealed positive psychometric properties of the scale after its apparent validity was verified. Additionally, principal component analysis, using a latent root criterion greater than one (Eigenvalue > 1), and performing Varimax rotation, resulted in five factors that represent decision‐making styles (dependent, avoidant, confident, rational, intuitive) that explain 53.67% of the total variance. Through the application of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the outcomes showcased favorable conformity indicators. The ratio of chi‐square value to degrees of freedom was recorded at less than 5 (x2/df = 1.531). The RMSEA index, at 0.041, remained below the accepted threshold of 0.08. The metrics (CFI, TLI, GFI, IFI) all surpassed 0.90, falling within acceptable ranges. Strong internal consistency between item scores and their respective factors was established by Pearson coefficients. The correlation coefficients between each factor's score and the total scale score were robust, ranging from 0.483 to 0.727. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale's factors ranged from 0.788 (highest) to 0.723 (lowest), with an overall scale stability coefficient of 0.748. These high coefficients collectively confirm the scale's validity, reliability, and appropriateness for implementation within the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region.

Major domain of socioscientific decision making: Preliminary questionnaire development

Profile of Junior High School Students’ Scientific Literacy

How do Students Deal with Socio-scientific Issues: A Development of Students’ Decision-Making Skills Instrument

Analysis of the Science Literacy Profile of Students at State Junior High School

Digital Literacy Competence Levels of Indonesian Junior High School Students Based on Activities Through The 5m Approach

Digital Literacy of Junior High School Students in Jember as an Indicator of Readiness in Facing the Society 5.0 Era in Science Learning

Revisiting the scientific habits of mind scale for socio-scientific issues in the Indonesian context

Investigating the Knowledge Domains Science Teachers Use When Considering a Socioscientific Issue

Effectiveness of Socio-Scientific Issue (SSI) Based Science E-Modules to Increase Students' Scientific Literacy

The Use of The Quizizz Application in The Scientific Literacy Assessment of High School Students On Global Warming Material

Socio-Scientific Issues-Based Learning: The Effect on High School Students’ Metacognitive Skills

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF ISLAMIC AND INDONESIAN-BASED CONTEXTUAL SCIENCE LITERACY ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS

Scientific Literacy in Hybrid Learning with the STEM Approach for the Students of Primary School Teacher Education

A Need Analysis Of Reaction Rate Electronic Module With Socio-Scientific Issues Approach To Improve Student Science Literacy

Students’ scientific reasoning and argumentative abilities through levels of inquiry models based on socio-scientific issue

Attitudes towards science in higher education: Validation of questionnaire among science teacher candidates and engineering students in Indonesia

Validitas dan Kepraktisan Modul Digital Berbasis Socio Scientific Issue

Development and Validation of Scientific Inquiry Literacy Instrument (SILI) Using Rasch Measurement Model

Improving Students' Scientific Literacy: Learning Studies Using Science Teaching Materials on Circulatory System Materials

Using the Rasch Model to Measure Students' Argumentative Ability in the Context of Socioscientific Issues About the Covid-19 Pandemic

Psychometric characteristics of the decision‐making ability scale among high school students