Abstract:Abstract The goal of the current study was to interrogate aspects of the cascade-of-control model [Banich, M. T. Executive function: The search for an integrated account. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 89–94, 2009; Banich, M. T. The Stroop effect occurs at multiple points along a cascade of control: Evidence from cognitive neuroscience approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2164, 2019], a neurocognitive model that posits how portions of pFC interact in a cascade-like manner to overcome interference from task-irrelevant information, and to test whether it could be used to predict individual differences in cognitive control outside the scanner. Participants (n = 62) completed two fMRI Word–Picture Stroop tasks, one containing emotional stimuli and one containing non-emotional stimuli, as well as a behavioral out-of-scanner Color–Word Stroop task at each of two time points. In a departure from the traditional approach of using a single task contrast to index neural activation across all ROIs, the current study utilized specific ROI by contrast pairings selected based on the specific level of control hypothesized by the cascade-of-control model to occur within that region. In addition, data across both tasks and both time points were combined to create composite measures of neural activation and of behavior. Consistent with the cascade-of-control model, individual differences in brain activation for specific contrasts within each of the three ROIs were associated with behavioral interference on the standard Color–Word Stroop task. Testing of alternative models revealed that these brain–behavior relationships were specific to the theoretically driven ROI by contrast pairings. Furthermore, such relationships were not observed across single-task and single-time point measures, but instead emerged from the composite measures. These findings provide evidence that brain activation observed across multiple regions of frontal cortex, each of which likely exerts cognitive control in a differential manner, is capable of predicting individual differences in behavioral performance.

Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task

No pupillometric evidence for effortful proactive control in the proportion-congruent Stroop paradigm

Changes in pupil size track self-control failure

Pupillary correlates of individual differences in n-back task performance

Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.

The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task

Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

The Influence of Attentional Control on Stimulus Processing is Category Specific in Stroop Tasks

Alertness and cognitive control: Interactions in the spatial Stroop task

Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies

Response Modality and the Stroop Task

Preparatory attention: experiment and theory

The Dynamics of Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control Processes in the Human Brain

Composite Measures of Brain Activation Predict Individual Differences in Behavioral Stroop Interference

Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies

The Complex Pre-Execution Stage Of Auditory Cognitive Control: Erps Evidence From Stroop Tasks

An examination of individual differences in levels of processing

Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?

Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.

Neural Correlates of Stimulus and Response Interference in a 2–1 Mapping Stroop Task