Abstract:Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical procedure to simultaneously compare multiple interventions. Despite the added complexity of performing an NMA compared with the traditional pairwise meta-analysis, under proper assumptions the NMA can lead to more efficient estimates on the comparisons of interventions by combining and contrasting the direct and indirect evidence into a form of evidence that can be used to underpin treatment guidelines. Two broad classes of NMA methods are commonly used in practice: the contrast-based (CB-NMA) and the arm-based (AB-NMA) models. While CB-NMA only focuses on the relative effects by assuming fixed intercepts, the AB-NMA offers greater flexibility on the estimands, including both the absolute and relative effects by assuming random intercepts. A major criticism of the AB-NMA, on which we aim to elaborate in this paper, is that it does not retain randomization within trials, which may introduce bias in the estimated relative effects in some scenarios. This criticism was drawn under the implicit assumption that a given relative effect is transportable, in which case the data generating mechanism favors the inference based on CB-NMA, which models the relative effect. In this article, we aim to review, summarize, and elaborate on the underlying assumptions, similarities and differences, and also the advantages and disadvantages, between CB-NMA and AB-NMA methods. As indirect treatment comparison is susceptible to risk of bias no matter which approach is taken, it is important to consider both approaches in practice as complementary sensitivity analyses and to provide the totality of evidence from the data.

Bayesian estimation and prediction for network meta-analysis with contrast-based approach

Nonparametric Bayesian Approach to Treatment Ranking in Network Meta-Analysis with Application to Comparisons of Antidepressants

Bayesian network meta‐regression hierarchical models using heavy‐tailed multivariate random effects with covariate‐dependent variances

Bayesian model-based outlier detection in network meta-analysis

Network meta-analysis made simple: a composite likelihood approach

Exploiting multivariate network meta-analysis: A calibrated Bayesian composite likelihood inference

Information-Theoretic Scoring Rules to Learn Additive Bayesian Network Applied to Epidemiology

Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies with interpretable priors

A review and comparison of arm-based versus contrast-based network meta-analysis for binary outcomes-Understanding their differences and limitations

Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis in Medicine

Bayesian Mediation Analysis.

Using Bayesian Meta-Regression to Advance Prevention Science Research: an Introduction and Empirical Illustration

A Bayesian Group Sequential Design for Randomized Biosimilar Clinical Trials with Adaptive Information Borrowing from Historical Data

A gentle introduction to network meta-analysis for orthodontists

Software and Package Applicating for Network Meta‐analysis: A Usage‐based Comparative Study

A multilevel approach to network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework

Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis using the bayesmeta R package

Sharing information across patient subgroups to draw conclusions from sparse treatment networks

Outlier detection and influence diagnostics in network meta-analysis

Non-inferiority and networks: inferring efficacy from a web of data

Bayesian Inference of Networks Across Multiple Sample Groups and Data Types