Abstract:Background: Availability of linked biomedical and social science data has risen dramatically in past decades, facilitating holistic and systems-based analyses. Among these, Bayesian networks have great potential to tackle complex interdisciplinary problems, because they can easily model inter-relations between variables. They work by encoding conditional independence relationships discovered via advanced inference algorithms. One challenge is dealing with missing data, ubiquitous in survey or biomedical datasets. Missing data is rarely addressed in an advanced way in Bayesian networks; the most common approach is to discard all samples containing missing measurements. This can lead to biased estimates. Here, we examine how Bayesian network structure learning can incorporate missing data. Methods: We use a simulation approach to compare a commonly used method in frequentist statistics, multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE), with one specific for Bayesian network learning, structural expectation-maximization (SEM). We simulate multiple incomplete categorical (discrete) data sets with different missingness mechanisms, variable numbers, data amount, and missingness proportions. We evaluate performance of MICE and SEM in capturing network structure. We then apply SEM combined with community analysis to a real-world dataset of linked biomedical and social data to investigate associations between socio-demographic factors and multiple chronic conditions in the US elderly population. Results: We find that applying either method (MICE or SEM) provides better structure recovery than doing nothing, and SEM in general outperforms MICE. This finding is robust across missingness mechanisms, variable numbers, data amount and missingness proportions. We also find that imputed data from SEM is more accurate than from MICE. Our real-world application recovers known inter-relationships among socio-demographic factors and common multimorbidities. This network analysis also highlights potential areas of investigation, such as links between cancer and cognitive impairment and disconnect between self-assessed memory decline and standard cognitive impairment measurement. Conclusion: Our simulation results suggest taking advantage of the additional information provided by network structure during SEM improves the performance of Bayesian networks; this might be especially useful for social science and other interdisciplinary analyses. Our case study show that comorbidities of different diseases interact with each other and are closely associated with socio-demographic factors.

Exploiting multivariate network meta-analysis: A calibrated Bayesian composite likelihood inference

Network meta-analysis made simple: a composite likelihood approach

A multilevel approach to network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework

Bayesian network meta‐regression hierarchical models using heavy‐tailed multivariate random effects with covariate‐dependent variances

Bayesian estimation and prediction for network meta-analysis with contrast-based approach

A Unified Method for Improved Inference in Random-effects Meta-analysis

Bayesian multivariate meta‐analysis with multiple outcomes

Bayesian model-based outlier detection in network meta-analysis

Multivariate network meta-analysis of survival function parameters

Outlier detection and influence diagnostics in network meta-analysis

Nonparametric Bayesian Approach to Treatment Ranking in Network Meta-Analysis with Application to Comparisons of Antidepressants

Use of copula to model within-study association in bivariate meta-analysis of binomial data at the aggregate level a Bayesian approach and application to surrogate endpoint evaluation

Estimating within‐study covariances in multivariate meta‐analysis with multiple outcomes

A pseudo-likelihood approach for multivariate meta-analysis of test accuracy studies with multiple thresholds

A Bayesian Bias-Adjusted Random-Effects Model for Synthesizing Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials and Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions.

Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies with interpretable priors

A complex meta-regression model to identify effective features of interventions from multi-arm, multi-follow-up trials

A review and comparison of arm-based versus contrast-based network meta-analysis for binary outcomes-Understanding their differences and limitations

A Complex Meta‐Regression Model to Identify Effective Features of Interventions From Multi‐Arm, Multi‐Follow‐Up Trials

Publication bias adjustment in network meta-analysis: an inverse probability weighting approach using clinical trial registries

Treatment of missing data in Bayesian network structure learning: an application to linked biomedical and social survey data