Mesolimbic local field potentials are modulated by motor control
Leah G Mann,Helen Qian,Natasha Cindy Hughes,Zixiang Zhao,Balbir Singh,Zhengyang Wang,Graham W. Johnson,Jenna N. Fulton,Bailu Yan,Hakmook Kang,Rui Li,Benoit M. Dawant,Dario J. Englot,Christos Constantinidis,Shawniqua Williams Roberson,Daniel O. Claassen,Sarah K. Bick
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.02.601451
2024-07-04
Abstract:Background and Objectives: While historically cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical loops were believed to process limbic and sensorimotor data in parallel, there is now evidence to suggest that the two information streams can be processed in a single open loop. However, the limbic-motor interface remains insufficiently characterized. We sought to further investigate how extrastriatal regions may regulate motor output by examining electrophysiological activity in these areas during a response inhibition paradigm.
Methods: We recorded local field potentials (LFPs) from epilepsy patients implanted with intracranial depth electrodes for seizure localization purposes. Participants performed the stop-signal task, during which they made speeded choice reactions to go stimuli and occasionally inhibited their reactions in the incident of a stop signal. To compare power during movement and the absence of movement, we applied a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Additionally, we performed a linear mixed-effects model to relate power in limbic regions to power in the motor cortex. Finally, we implemented exploratory analyses to identify power differences for correct go versus correct stop trials and for correct stop versus incorrect stop trials using cluster-based permutation testing.
Results: 14 patients participated. A comparison between movement and baseline fixation revealed that motor response is associated with reduced beta (15-35 Hz) power in the amygdala, hippocampus, and motor cortex and reduced gamma (35-100 Hz) power in the amygdala and hippocampus. Moreover, average beta and gamma power in the amygdala and hippocampus during motor execution were positively associated with average beta and gamma power in the motor cortex. Additionally, we identified significant differences between correct go and stop trials in delta (1-4 Hz) power for all three regions and in theta (4-8 Hz) power for the amygdala and motor cortex. Likewise, we identified significant differences between correct and incorrect stop trials in delta power for the hippocampus and motor cortex, in theta power for the motor cortex, in alpha (8-15 Hz) and beta power for the amygdala and motor cortex, and in gamma power for all three areas.
Discussion: These correlations between neural oscillations in the hippocampus and amygdala and movement strengthen the notion of mesolimbic modulation of motor activity.
Neuroscience