Abstract:Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze the disciplinary coverage of the Thomson Reuters' Book Citation Index database focusing on publisher presence, impact and specialization. Design/Methodology/approach: We conduct a descriptive study in which we examine coverage by discipline, publisher distribution by field and country of publication, and publisher impact. For this the Thomson Reuters' Subject Categories were aggregated into 15 disciplines. Findings: 30% of the total share of this database belongs to the fields of Humanities and Social Sciences. Most of the disciplines are covered by very few publishers mainly from the UK and USA (75.05% of the books), in fact 33 publishers concentrate 90% of the whole share. Regarding publisher impact, 80.5% of the books and chapters remained uncited. Two serious errors were found in this database. Firstly, the Book Citation Index does not retrieve all citations for books and chapters. Secondly, book citations do not include citations to their chapters. Research limitations/implications: The Book Citation Index is still underdeveloped and has serious limitations which call into caution when using it for bibliometric purposes. Practical implications: The results obtained from this study warn against the use of this database for bibliometric purposes, but opens a new window of opportunities for covering long neglected areas such as Humanities and Social Sciences. The target audience of this study is librarians, bibliometricians, researchers, scientific publishers, prospective authors and evaluation agencies. Originality/Value: There are currently no studies analyzing in depth the coverage of this novel database which covers monographs.

Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the Book Citation Index

Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and types of publishers in the Book Citation Index

Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index

Survey of Visualization Methods on Academic Citation Information

Coverage, field specialization and impact of scientific publishers indexed in the 'Book Citation Index'

Towards a Book Publishers Citation Reports. First approach using the Book Citation Index

Visualization of the Citation Impact Environments of Scientific Journals: An online mapping exercise

Citing for High Impact

Library Catalog Analysis and Library Holdings Counts: Origins, Methodological Issues and Application to the Field of Informetrics

The field-specific citation and usage patterns of book literature in the Book Citation Index

Mapping Interdisciplinarity at the Interfaces Between the Science Citation Index and the Social Science Citation Index

Various Methods for the Mapping of Science

The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals

Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database

Filling the citation gap: Measuring the multidimensional impact of the academic book at institutional level with PlumX

Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools.

Nine million book items and eleven million citations: a study of book-based scholarly communication using OpenCitations

A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through Google Scholar Citations: The case of Bibliometrics

“Books” and “book chapters” in the book citation index (BKCI) and science citation index (SCI, SoSCI, A&HCI)

Mapping the backbone of the Humanities through the eyes of Wikipedia

Intellectual structure of Library and Information Science in Iberoamerica using journal co-citation analysis: a comparative study based on Scopus and Web of Science