Examining the usage, citation, and diffusion patterns of bibliometric mapping software: A comparative study of three tools.

Xuelian Pan,Erjia Yan,Ming Cui,Weina Hua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.005
IF: 3.7
2018-01-01
Journal of Informetrics
Abstract:•This paper conducts a content analysis of a sample of 481 English core journal articles using three bibliometric mapping software tools (CiteSpace, HistCite and VOSviewer) to reveal the predominant mention and citation practices.•We employ several diffusion indicators (e.g., diffusion breadth and speed on the article, journal and domain levels) to provide insight into the influence and diffusion patterns of the three software tools.•Researchers mention and cite the three software tools in diverse ways and some of them fail to provide a formal citation of the three software tools.•Among the three software tools, VOSviewer is more frequently used than CiteSpace and HistCite.•The three tools are adopted fastest and most frequently in library and information science research, and they are then gradually adopted in other areas of study, initially at a lower diffusion speed but afterward at a rapidly growing rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?