Abstract:Key points Excitatory inputs to the locus coeruleus (LC) are important for driving norepinephrine neuron activity and downstream behaviors in response to salient stimuli, but little is known about the functional properties of different glutamate inputs that innervate these neurons We used a viral‐mediated optogenetic approach to compare glutamate afferents from the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the lateral hypothalamus (LH) and the periaqueductal grey (PAG). While PFC was predicted to make synaptic inputs, we found that the LH and PAG also drove robust excitatory events in LC norepinephrine neurons. The strength, kinetics and short‐term plasticity of each input differed as did the extent of neuromodulation by both dynorphin and corticotrophin releasing factor. Thus each input in displayed a unique set of basal properties and modulation by peptides. This characterization is an important step in deciphering the heterogeneity of the LC. Excitatory inputs drive burst firing of locus coeruleus (LC) norepinephrine (NE) neurons in response to a variety of stimuli. Though a small number of glutamatergic LC afferents have been investigated, the overall landscape of these excitatory inputs is largely unknown. The current study used an optogenetic approach to isolate three glutamatergic afferents: the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the lateral hypothalamus (LH) and periaqueductal grey (PAG). AAV5‐DIO‐ChR2 was injected into each region in male and female CaMKII‐Cre mice and the properties of excitatory inputs on LC‐NE cells were measured. Notably we found differences among these inputs. First, the pattern of axonal innervation differed between inputs such that LH afferents were concentrated in the posterior portion of the LC‐NE somatic region while PFC afferents were denser in the medial dendritic region. Second, basal intrinsic properties varied for afferents, with LH inputs having the highest connectivity and the largest amplitude excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) while PAG inputs had the lowest initial release probability. Third, while orexin and oxytocin had minimal effects on any input, dynorphin strongly inhibited excitatory inputs originating from the LH and PAG, and corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) selectively inhibited inputs from the PAG. Overall, these results demonstrate that individual afferents to the LC have differing properties, which may contribute to the modularity of the LC and its ability to mediate various behavioral outcomes. figure legend Norepinephrine (NE) neurons in the locus coerueleus (LC) receive glutamatergic inputs from various regions of the brain that drive their activity. In order to characterize how these afferents differ from one another with respect to synaptic properties, an optogenetic approach was used to isolate inputs from three specific regions: lateral hypothalamus (LH), periaqueductal grey (PAG), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). CaMKII‐Cre mice were injected with channelrhodopsin into these target afferents and optically‐evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were recorded from LC‐NE cells using whole‐cell slice electrophysiology. We found that basally, EPSCs from PFC afferents had the lowest amplitude. LH inputs conversely had the highest amplitude and also the highest probability of connectivity. PAG inputs were similar in size to PFC, though they were facilitating indicating a higher release probability. Further exploring these connections in the context of neuromodulation, we found that only LH and PAG inputs were sensitive to dynorphin‐induced synaptic depression. PFC afferents were unaffected by dynorphin treatment. The PAG inputs were also sensitive to CRF, exhibiting a slight depression in the presence of the peptide, which was not observed in LH or PFC inputs. These results overall show that different glutamatergic afferents to the LC have unique properties that may result in differential influences on LC‐NE activity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Subunit‐specific expression and function of AMPA receptors in the mouse locus coeruleus

Properties and modulation of excitatory inputs to the locus coeruleus

Long-term Potentiation Alters the Modulator Pharmacology of AMPA-type Glutamate Receptors.

Variations of neuronal properties in the region of locus coeruleus of mice

Juxtacellular recordings from identified neurons in the mouse locus coeruleus

Input-specific localization of NMDA receptor GluN2 subunits in thalamocortical neurons

Long Latency of Evoked Quantal Transmitter Release from Somata of Locus Coeruleus Neurons in Rat Pontine Slices

Differential Regulation of AMPA Receptor GluA1 Phosphorylation at Serine 831 and 845 Associated with Activation of NMDA Receptor Subpopulations

Physiological and Molecular Properties of AMPA/Kainate Receptors Expressed by Striatal Medium Spiny Neurons

Autocrine Neuromodulation and Network Activity Patterns in the Locus Coeruleus of Newborn Rat Slices

Tonic and burst-like locus coeruleus stimulation distinctly shift network activity across the cortical hierarchy

Spatial organization of AMPAR subtypes in ON RGCs

Subunit Composition of Synaptic AMPA Receptors Revealed by a Single-Cell Genetic Approach

Behavioral Deficits and Subregion-Specific Suppression of LTP in Mice Expressing a Population of Mutant NMDA Receptors Throughout the Hippocampus

Specific roles of AMPA receptor subunit GluR1 (GluA1) phosphorylation sites in regulating synaptic plasticity in the CA1 region of hippocampus

Sex differences in single neuron function and proteomics profiles examined by patch‐clamp and mass spectrometry in the locus coeruleus of the adult mouse

Extrasynaptic NMDA Receptors on Rod Pathway Amacrine Cells: Molecular Composition, Activation, and Signaling

LTP Requires a Reserve Pool of Glutamate Receptors Independent of Subunit Type.

Regulation of the intracellular distribution, cell surface expression, and protein levels of AMPA receptor GluR2 subunits by the monocarboxylate transporter MCT2 in neuronal cells

The NMDA receptor subunit GluN3A regulates synaptic activity-induced and myocyte enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C)-dependent transcription