Abstract:Key points Excitatory inputs to the locus coeruleus (LC) are important for driving norepinephrine neuron activity and downstream behaviors in response to salient stimuli, but little is known about the functional properties of different glutamate inputs that innervate these neurons We used a viral‐mediated optogenetic approach to compare glutamate afferents from the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the lateral hypothalamus (LH) and the periaqueductal grey (PAG). While PFC was predicted to make synaptic inputs, we found that the LH and PAG also drove robust excitatory events in LC norepinephrine neurons. The strength, kinetics and short‐term plasticity of each input differed as did the extent of neuromodulation by both dynorphin and corticotrophin releasing factor. Thus each input in displayed a unique set of basal properties and modulation by peptides. This characterization is an important step in deciphering the heterogeneity of the LC. Excitatory inputs drive burst firing of locus coeruleus (LC) norepinephrine (NE) neurons in response to a variety of stimuli. Though a small number of glutamatergic LC afferents have been investigated, the overall landscape of these excitatory inputs is largely unknown. The current study used an optogenetic approach to isolate three glutamatergic afferents: the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the lateral hypothalamus (LH) and periaqueductal grey (PAG). AAV5‐DIO‐ChR2 was injected into each region in male and female CaMKII‐Cre mice and the properties of excitatory inputs on LC‐NE cells were measured. Notably we found differences among these inputs. First, the pattern of axonal innervation differed between inputs such that LH afferents were concentrated in the posterior portion of the LC‐NE somatic region while PFC afferents were denser in the medial dendritic region. Second, basal intrinsic properties varied for afferents, with LH inputs having the highest connectivity and the largest amplitude excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) while PAG inputs had the lowest initial release probability. Third, while orexin and oxytocin had minimal effects on any input, dynorphin strongly inhibited excitatory inputs originating from the LH and PAG, and corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) selectively inhibited inputs from the PAG. Overall, these results demonstrate that individual afferents to the LC have differing properties, which may contribute to the modularity of the LC and its ability to mediate various behavioral outcomes. figure legend Norepinephrine (NE) neurons in the locus coerueleus (LC) receive glutamatergic inputs from various regions of the brain that drive their activity. In order to characterize how these afferents differ from one another with respect to synaptic properties, an optogenetic approach was used to isolate inputs from three specific regions: lateral hypothalamus (LH), periaqueductal grey (PAG), and prefrontal cortex (PFC). CaMKII‐Cre mice were injected with channelrhodopsin into these target afferents and optically‐evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were recorded from LC‐NE cells using whole‐cell slice electrophysiology. We found that basally, EPSCs from PFC afferents had the lowest amplitude. LH inputs conversely had the highest amplitude and also the highest probability of connectivity. PAG inputs were similar in size to PFC, though they were facilitating indicating a higher release probability. Further exploring these connections in the context of neuromodulation, we found that only LH and PAG inputs were sensitive to dynorphin‐induced synaptic depression. PFC afferents were unaffected by dynorphin treatment. The PAG inputs were also sensitive to CRF, exhibiting a slight depression in the presence of the peptide, which was not observed in LH or PFC inputs. These results overall show that different glutamatergic afferents to the LC have unique properties that may result in differential influences on LC‐NE activity. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Juxtacellular recordings from identified neurons in the mouse locus coeruleus

Variations of neuronal properties in the region of locus coeruleus of mice

Subunit‐specific expression and function of AMPA receptors in the mouse locus coeruleus

Sex differences in single neuron function and proteomics profiles examined by patch‐clamp and mass spectrometry in the locus coeruleus of the adult mouse

Chlorotoxin-mediated disinhibition of noradrenergic locus coeruleus neurons using a conditional transgenic approach

Characterization of Neuronal Intrinsic Properties and Synaptic Transmission in Layer I of Anterior Cingulate Cortex from Adult Mice

Tonic and burst-like locus coeruleus stimulation distinctly shift network activity across the cortical hierarchy

Autocrine Neuromodulation and Network Activity Patterns in the Locus Coeruleus of Newborn Rat Slices

Targeting Norepinephrine Neurons of the Locus Coeruleus: A Comparison of Model Systems and Strategies

Opto-juxtacellular interrogation of neural circuits in freely moving mice

Probing the structure and function of locus coeruleus projections to CNS motor centers

Noradrenergic Neurons Expressing Substance P Receptor (NK1) in the Locus Coeruleus Complex: a Double Immunofluorescence Study in the Rat

In search of the locus coeruleus: guidelines to identify anatomical boundaries and physiological properties of the blue spot in mice, fish, finches and beyond

Locus Coeruleus in Non-Mammalian Vertebrates

Long Latency of Evoked Quantal Transmitter Release from Somata of Locus Coeruleus Neurons in Rat Pontine Slices

Singular subsets of locus coeruleus neurons may recover tyrosine hydroxylase phenotype transiently expressed during development

Physiology of quantal norepinephrine release from somatodendritic sites of neurons in locus coeruleus.

Locus coeruleus: a new look at the blue spot

Criteria for Intracellular Identification of Pre-Sympathetic Neurons in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla in the Rat

Properties and modulation of excitatory inputs to the locus coeruleus

Generation of Locus Coeruleus Norepinephrine Neurons from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.