Characterization of GafchromicTM EBT4 film with clinical kV/MV photons and MeV electrons

Fada Guan,Huixiao Chen,Emily Draeger,Yuting Li,Resat Aydin,Christopher J. Tien,Zhe Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pro6.1204
2023-06-26
Precision Radiation Oncology
Abstract:The beam energy�specific calibration curves of EBT4 film for MV photon and MeV electron beams and kilovoltage x�ray beams are plotted together in Figure G1, which shows the minimal energy dependence for MV photons and MeV electrons, but non�negligible energy dependence for the kilovoltage x�ray beams. The signal�to�noise ratio (SNR) between EBT3 and EBT4 film models for different dose levels from a 6 MV photon beam are compared in Figure G2, which shows the improved SNR of EBT4, as described in the vendor�stated specifications. Figure G1. Beam energy�specific calibration curves of EBT4 film for MV photon and MeV electron beams and kilovoltage x�ray beams. Figure G2. Comparison of signal�to�noise ratio between EBT3 and EBT4 film models from a 6 MV photon beam. Only the data from the red channel are presented. A newly developed GafchromicTM EBT4 film model was released recently. According to the vendor�stated specifications, this new model maintains major features of its more recent predecessor, EBT3, but has a great improvement in the signal�to�noise ratio (SNR). The purpose of this study was to fully characterize the EBT4 model by testing its dose response dependence on beam energy using clinical photon and electron beams and validating its improvement in SNR. In the beam energy dependence experiments, 6 MV and 15 MV photon beams, 6 MeV, 12 MeV and 20 MeV electron beams, 120 kVp and two 250 kVp x�ray beams (with different half�layer values) were selected, representing different clinical beam energies and radiation types. In the noise and SNR analyses, only the 6 MV photon beam was selected as the representative to compare between EBT4 and EBT3 models. The energy dependence test results showed that there was a slight difference ( 10%) in the dose response was found for the 120 kVp x�ray beam. For the two 250 kVp x�ray beams, the difference in the dose response was moderate (<5%), but not negligible. The noise and SNR results showed a reduced noise and strengthened SNR in EBT4. We conclude that the EBT4 film has a minimal energy dependence for MV photon and MeV electron beams but has a notable energy dependence for kilovoltage x�ray beams, and the vendor�stated features of the reduced noise and improved SNR in EBT4 are validated.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?