The Milan score: A novel manometric tool for a more efficient diagnosis of gastro‐esophageal reflux disease
Stefano Siboni,Marco Sozzi,Ivan Kristo,Sara Boveri,Benjamin D. Rogers,Nicola De Bortoli,Anthony Hobson,Brian E. Louie,Yeong Yeh Lee,Salvatore Tolone,Elisa Marabotto,Pierfrancesco Visaggi,Jordan Haworth,Megan L. Ivy,Garrett Greenan,Takahiro Masuda,Roberto Penagini,Benedetta Barcella,Marina Coletta,Dimitrios Theodorou,Tania Triantafyllou,Chiara Facchini,Vincent Tee,Luigi Bonavina,Lorenzo Cusmai,Sebastian F. Schoppmann,Edoardo Savarino,Emanuele Asti,C. Prakash Gyawali
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12565
2024-03-27
United European Gastroenterology Journal
Abstract:Abstract Objective A definitive diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) depends on endoscopic and/or pH‐study criteria. However, high resolution manometry (HRM) can identify factors predicting GERD, such as ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), esophago‐gastric junction contractile integral (EGJ‐CI), evaluating esophagogastric junction (EGJ) type and straight leg raise (SLR) maneuver response. We aimed to build and externally validate a manometric score (Milan Score) to stratify the risk and severity of the disease in patients undergoing HRM for suspected GERD. Methods A population of 295 consecutive patients undergoing HRM and pH‐study for persistent typical or atypical GERD symptoms was prospectively enrolled to build a model and a nomogram that provides a risk score for AET > 6%. Collected HRM data included IEM, EGJ‐CI, EGJ type and SLR. A supplemental cohort of patients undergoing HRM and pH‐study was also prospectively enrolled in 13 high‐volume esophageal function laboratories across the world in order to validate the model. Discrimination and calibration were used to assess model's accuracy. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was defined as acid exposure time >6%. Results Out of the analyzed variables, SLR response and EGJ subtype 3 had the highest impact on the score (odd ratio 18.20 and 3.87, respectively). The external validation cohort consisted of 233 patients. In the validation model, the corrected Harrel c‐index was 0.90. The model‐fitting optimism adjusted calibration slope was 0.93 and the integrated calibration index was 0.07, indicating good calibration. Conclusions A novel HRM score for GERD diagnosis has been created and validated. The MS might be a useful screening tool to stratify the risk and the severity of GERD, allowing a more comprehensive pathophysiologic assessment of the anti‐reflux barrier. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05851482).
gastroenterology & hepatology