Anterolateral Structure Reconstruction Similarly Improves the Stability and Causes Less Overconstraint in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees Compared with Modified Lemaire Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Biomechanical Study
Junjie Xu,Kang Han,Thay Q. Lee,Caiqi Xu,Wei Su,Jiebo Chen,Jiakuo Yu,Shikui Dong,Jinzhong Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.06.023
2022-01-01
Abstract:Purpose: To compare the kinematics of anterolateral structure (ALS) reconstruction (ALSR) and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in ACL-ALS-deficient knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees with the following conditions were tested: (1) intact, (2) ACL-ALS deficiency, (3) ACL reconstruction (ACLR), (4) ACLR combined with ALSR (ACL-ALSR) or LET (ACLR+LET). Anterior translation and tibial internal rotation were measured with 90-N anterior load and 5 N.m internal torque at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees. The anterolateral translation and internal rotation were also measured during a simulated pivot-shift test at 0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, and 45 degrees. The knee kinematic changes in all reconstructions were compared with each other, with intact knees as the baseline. Results: Isolated ACLR failed to restore native knee kinematics in ACL-ALS-deficient knees. Both ACL-ALSR and ACLR+LET procedures decreased the anterior instability of the ACLR. However, ACLR+LET caused overconstraints in internal rotation at 30 degrees (-3.73 degrees +/- 2.60 degrees, P = .023), 60 degrees (-4.96 degrees +/- 2.22 degrees, P = .001) and 90 degrees (-6.14 degrees +/- 1.60 degrees, P < .001). ACL-ALSR also over-constrained the knee at 60 degrees (-3.65 degrees +/- 1.90 degrees, P < .001) and 90 degrees (-3.18 degrees +/- 2.53 degrees, P < .001). For a simulated pivot-shift test, both combined procedures significantly reduced the ACLR instability, with anterolateral translation and internal rotation being overconstrained in ACLR+LET at 30 degrees (-3.32mm +/- 3.89mm, P = .005; -2.58 degrees +/- 1.61 degrees, P < .001) and 45 degrees (-3.02mm +/- 3.95 mm, P = .012; -3.44 degrees +/- 2.86 degrees, P < .001). However, the ACL-ALSR overconstrained only the anterolateral translation at 30 degrees (-1.51mm +/- 2.39mm, P = .046) and internal rotation at 45 degrees (-2.09 degrees +/- 1.70 degrees, P < .001). There were no significant differences between the two combined procedures at most testing degrees in each testing state, except for the internal rotation at 30 degrees (P = .007) and 90 degrees (P = .032) in internal rotation torque. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction alone did not restore intact knee kinematics in knees with concurrent ACL tears and severe ALS injury (ACL-ALS-deficient status). Both ACL-ALSR and ACLR+LET procedures restored knee stability at some flexion degrees, with less overconstraints in internal rotation resulting from ACL-ALSR.