Abstract:A widely accepted theory is challenged in this paper. Foreign firms’ pricing premium from listing in the US was considered as a result of better regulation and protection of minority shareholders of the listed companies. This paper raises another viewpoint that the regulation clauses may not have been implemented as well as people used to think. The information asymmetry between the US regulators and the overseas firms creates the possibility that illegal activities such as forging documents and faking financial reports may not be discovered in time, especially when listing is through a non-IPO way like reverse merger transactions. As a result, the de facto poorly performed foreign companies also have a chance to list in the US exchanges by exaggerating their business performance in balance sheets and profit from selling stocks to American investors in the secondary market as long as their improper behaviors are not perceived by the regulators before listing. Therefore in contrast to what the existing literature has assumed, there are two types of foreign firms traded on the NYSE, Nasdaq and Amex: good firms with growth opportunities and bad firms which cheat the investors. As investors realize the existence of the bad firms, the problem becomes similar to the market of lemons. Price of the foreign stocks from countries with more information asymmetry, poorer legal enforcement and corporate governance could go down and the cross-listing premium may disappear. This paper uses firm-level accounting data of the Chinese stocks listed in the US exchanges and listed in the four stock markets in mainland China to prove the above hypothesis. Cross-listing discount, instead of premium, is found. Tobin’s q premium from listing in the US has been decreasing from year 2006 when the Chinese firms’ accounting fraud was first reported and finally turned to be negative. The widely reported financial fraud of the US-listed Chinese firms after 2010 proves the correctness of the aforementioned two-type-firm theory. Accordingly, the US-listed Chinese firms with more information disclosure are higher valuated, including firms listed via IPO rather than reverse merger, firms from large Chinese cities with better legal enforcement and easier verification of information authenticity, and large firms which are covered by more analysts and media. As for the hypothesis that bad companies prefer exaggerating their performance in financial reports, the historical data does show that the already delisted companies reported a much higher 12-month trailing EPS before their delisting. Moreover, when there is less information asymmetry and more information disclosure, price of the US-listed Chinese stocks goes up.

The impact of democracy on liquidity and information asymmetry for NYSE cross‐listed stocks

The Stock Market Implication of Political Connections: Evidence from Firms' Dividend Policy

Disproportional Ownership Structure and Stock Market Liquidity in China

Effect of media freedom on liquidity and information asymmetry: evidence from non-U.S. stocks in the NYSE

Democracy and stock market returns

Are Foreign Institutions More or Less Informed? Evidence from China's Stock Markets

Is Democracy Good for Corporate Investment?

Corporate ESG rating and stock market liquidity: Evidence from China

The Impact of Regulation Fair Disclosure on Information Asymmetry and Trading: an Intraday Analysis

The Impact of Terrorism on Liquidity and Information Asymmetry: Evidence from Non-U.S. Stocks Listed on the NYSE

Public data acces and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China

Stock market liberalization and the information environment

Does Stock Market Liquidity Affect Dividends?

Research on the relationship between ESG disclosure quality and stock liquidity of Chinese listed companies

TRADING COSTS OF NON‐U.S. STOCKS ON THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE: THE EFFECT OF INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP, ANALYST FOLLOWING, AND MARKET REGULATION

Does ESG performance promote vitality of capital market? Analysis from the perspective of stock liquidity

Are Foreign Companies Listed in the US Really Worth More? Information Asymmetry and Cross-listing Discount of China Concepts Stocks

Public Data Access and Stock Price Synchronicity: Evidence From China

The impact of corporate governance performance on the association between information asymmetry and opportunities' optimal levels: evidence from developed markets

The Impact of ESG Ratings on Stock Liquidity Risk: Evidence from the Chinese Market

Do ESG ratings improve capital market trading activities?